| Author |
Message |
Xan
Joined: 08 Feb 2004
Posts: 562
Location: Austin
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 1:18 am Post subject: New Star Trek film |
|
|
I went down to the Alamo Drafthouse tonight for a 9:50 show of Wrath of Khan. They showed a couple of minutes of it before Mr Nimoy appeared in the flesh, bearing a big canister containing the complete new film. We beat out the Australia "world premiere" by several hours.
It was awesome! Go see it when it comes out! |
|
| Back to top |
|
fos
Joined: 02 Jan 2009
Posts: 101
Location: Texas
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 6:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| That is incredible. How is Mr. Nimoy? |
|
| Back to top |
|
harmone
Joined: 21 Jun 2007
Posts: 100
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 9:47 am Post subject: Re: New Star Trek film |
|
|
Xan wrote: I went down to the Alamo Drafthouse tonight for a 9:50 show of Wrath of Khan. They showed a couple of minutes of it before Mr Nimoy appeared in the flesh, bearing a big canister containing the complete new film. We beat out the Australia "world premiere" by several hours.
It was awesome! Go see it when it comes out!
Are you talking about this movie?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Trek_(film)
So you got to see it one month before the premiere? Lucky bastard. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Xan
Joined: 08 Feb 2004
Posts: 562
Location: Austin
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 10:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
That's the movie, yeah. Nimoy looked really good for 78, and he was obviously having a great time playing to the crowd, which had been promised 10 minutes of the new movie after Khan finished. That was ostensibly why the guys in suits were checking for cell phones and cameras.
"Do you think it's fair that they get to see it first in Australia?"
"NO!"
"Wouldn't you rather see the whole thing instead of just 10 minutes?"
*wild applause*
I must be naturally skeptical, because I didn't believe he could actually deliver until I noticed he was carrying an enormous film canister. |
|
| Back to top |
|
harmone
Joined: 21 Jun 2007
Posts: 100
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 10:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Xan wrote: That's the movie, yeah. Nimoy looked really good for 78, and he was obviously having a great time playing to the crowd, which had been promised 10 minutes of the new movie after Khan finished. That was ostensibly why the guys in suits were checking for cell phones and cameras.
"Do you think it's fair that they get to see it first in Australia?"
"NO!"
"Wouldn't you rather see the whole thing instead of just 10 minutes?"
*wild applause*
I must be naturally skeptical, because I didn't believe he could actually deliver until I noticed he was carrying an enormous film canister.
Ahh.. So you only saw the first ten minutes. What a teaser. Hmm.. There is no mention on wikipedia as to when the movie will be released in Sweden. Do they still wait many months before they release a new movie in Sweden compared to USA? If so, what is the reason that they do that? They are in it for the money, I understand that. But I don't understand how they get more money from voluntary release delays. Anyone with a theory/explanation? |
|
| Back to top |
|
Xan
Joined: 08 Feb 2004
Posts: 562
Location: Austin
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 10:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| No no, we had been promised 10 minutes. What we got was the whole smash. |
|
| Back to top |
|
fos
Joined: 02 Jan 2009
Posts: 101
Location: Texas
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 1:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I saw Nimoy in person at a Trek convention back in the early seventies. That was at a time with only a few thousand showed up. It wouldn't be Star Trek without Mr. Spock! If I had only known, I would have driven to Austin!
Jeff |
|
| Back to top |
|
harmone
Joined: 21 Jun 2007
Posts: 100
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 5:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Hehe, nice to see fellow trekkies. I went to the premiere of one of the later Star Wars movies in an authentic (well, at least it was manufactured by Paramount Pictures) Star Trek Next Generation science officer uniform here in Sweden. I expected a bashing but no one cared. Except for a mother of two in an elevator lobby who reluctantly drew her children closer to herself. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Xan
Joined: 08 Feb 2004
Posts: 562
Location: Austin
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 5:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sounds like our friend fos is an original Trekkie. Neat! You should have driven to Austin. Of course, there were many people who didn't get in... And those were all people who thought they were waiting for Star Trek 2! (I hope they do actually screen that one; I've written to them about it.)
You still have the uniform, harmone? |
|
| Back to top |
|
fos
Joined: 02 Jan 2009
Posts: 101
Location: Texas
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 7:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was still in junior high school when the original Star Trek series came out. I was hooked!
Jeff |
|
| Back to top |
|
NeonNero
Joined: 04 Jan 2005
Posts: 214
Location: Ålesund, Norway
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 8:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
harmone wrote: Hmm.. There is no mention on wikipedia as to when the movie will be released in Sweden.
May 8 in many countries (including the "home country" USA), according to IMDb.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0796366/releaseinfo
harmone wrote: Do they still wait many months before they release a new movie in Sweden compared to USA? If so, what is the reason that they do that? They are in it for the money, I understand that. But I don't understand how they get more money from voluntary release delays. Anyone with a theory/explanation?
It greatly depends on the marketing budget for the movie and early interest in it, I think. If early reception is good while the movie is still in production, they might up the marketing budget a bit.
That's my theory, anyway. |
|
| Back to top |
|
harmone
Joined: 21 Jun 2007
Posts: 100
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 9:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Xan wrote:
You still have the uniform, harmone?
Yep! And I'm working on getting a body again that fits the damn thing. I bought it when I was slimmer. It's a good motivator ;). |
|
| Back to top |
|
jed
Joined: 28 Mar 2009
Posts: 394
Location: New Jersey
|
| Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Resurrecting old thread now that the movie has done its first weekend -- what's everybody's take from the film? Is it worth a theatre viewing?
RT has compiled a 95% (holy crap!), interestingly and unexpectedly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
hoopycat
Joined: 30 Aug 2008
Posts: 1286
Location: Rochester, New York
|
| Posted: Tue May 12, 2009 11:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
jed wrote: Is it worth a theatre viewing?
Absolutely. Without a doubt. |
|
| Back to top |
|
atourino
Joined: 23 Jan 2008
Posts: 34
|
| Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 6:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Have seen it twice now. Will watch it again a third time this weekend. It's absolutely brilliant. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |