| Author |
Message |
caker
Joined: 15 Apr 2003
Posts: 2906
Location: Galloway, NJ
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2011 7:10 pm Post subject: RFT: 2.6.38-linode31 and 2.6.38-x86_64-linode17 kernels |
|
|
Push out 2.6.38-linode31 this afternoon - would be great if I could get some feedback before pointing "Latest" to it!
Thanks,
-Chris |
|
| Back to top |
|
caker
Joined: 15 Apr 2003
Posts: 2906
Location: Galloway, NJ
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 12:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've added the availability of 2.6.38-x86_64-linode17 as well.
So far so good with our internal testing. If there no objections, Latest will point to these momentarily.
-Chris |
|
| Back to top |
|
caker
Joined: 15 Apr 2003
Posts: 2906
Location: Galloway, NJ
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Done!
http://www.linode.com/kernels/
http://www.linode.com/kernels/rss.xml
-Chris |
|
| Back to top |
|
Stever
Joined: 07 Dec 2007
Posts: 337
Location: NC, USA
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Might want to hold up on the x64 version - I got immediate fail on boot:
Code: blkfront: xvda: barriers enabled
xvda: unknown partition table
blkfront: xvdb: barriers enabled
Kernel panic - not syncing: No available IRQ to bind to: increase nr_irqs!
Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.38-x86_64-linode17 #1
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8141cc67>] ? panic+0x8c/0x195
[<ffffffff811f2cd2>] ? find_unbound_irq+0x94/0x9b
[<ffffffff811f2f2c>] ? bind_evtchn_to_irq+0x2d/0xb3
[<ffffffff811f381a>] ? HYPERVISOR_event_channel_op+0x15/0x46
[<ffffffff811f3476>] ? bind_evtchn_to_irqhandler+0x20/0x5a
[<ffffffff8123a05e>] ? blkif_interrupt+0x0/0x21a
[<ffffffff81239ac5>] ? talk_to_blkback+0x118/0x284
[<ffffffff8123aad0>] ? blkfront_probe+0x217/0x240
[<ffffffff811f6112>] ? xenbus_dev_probe+0x7e/0x10d
[<ffffffff812310c2>] ? driver_probe_device+0xa7/0x136
[<ffffffff8123119b>] ? __driver_attach+0x4a/0x66
[<ffffffff81231151>] ? __driver_attach+0x0/0x66
[<ffffffff812306ed>] ? bus_for_each_dev+0x4e/0x83
[<ffffffff81230f0d>] ? driver_attach+0x19/0x1b
[<ffffffff81230b6f>] ? bus_add_driver+0xb1/0x1fe
[<ffffffff81aaadec>] ? xlblk_init+0x0/0x7a
[<ffffffff8123144c>] ? driver_register+0x98/0x109
[<ffffffff81aaadec>] ? xlblk_init+0x0/0x7a
[<ffffffff811f5fac>] ? xenbus_register_driver_common+0x24/0x26
[<ffffffff811f6616>] ? __xenbus_register_frontend+0x29/0x42
[<ffffffff81aaadec>] ? xlblk_init+0x0/0x7a
[<ffffffff81aaae64>] ? xlblk_init+0x78/0x7a
[<ffffffff81002080>] ? do_one_initcall+0x7a/0x134
[<ffffffff81a86702>] ? kernel_init+0x15f/0x1e4
[<ffffffff8100a764>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[<ffffffff81009b73>] ? int_ret_from_sys_call+0x7/0x1b
[<ffffffff8141ef21>] ? retint_restore_args+0x5/0x6
[<ffffffff8100a760>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10
EDIT:
Always the same message, but the failure point seems a little random:
Code: blkfront: xvda: barriers enabled
xvda: unknown partition table
blkfront: xvdb: barriers enabled
xvdb: unknown partition table
Setting capacity to 1482752
xvdb: detected capacity change from 0 to 759169024
blkfront: xvdc: barriers enabled
Kernel panic - not syncing: No available IRQ to bind to: increase nr_irqs!
Code: brd: module loaded
loop: module loaded
blkfront: xvda: barriers enabled
Kernel panic - not syncing: No available IRQ to bind to: increase nr_irqs!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
glg
Joined: 09 Jan 2009
Posts: 505
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 2:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Why the rush to put this latest? Is there a bad kernel bug out there? |
|
| Back to top |
|
caker
Joined: 15 Apr 2003
Posts: 2906
Location: Galloway, NJ
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Stever wrote: Might want to hold up on the x64 version - I got immediate fail on boot:
Interesting. I booted just fine on your very host - even with a couple extra disk images.
I've made a change - can you try once more?
-Chris |
|
| Back to top |
|
Stever
Joined: 07 Dec 2007
Posts: 337
Location: NC, USA
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 5:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caker wrote: I've made a change - can you try once more?
Yep - boots just fine now :) |
|
| Back to top |
|
caker
Joined: 15 Apr 2003
Posts: 2906
Location: Galloway, NJ
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 5:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Great! I guess CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ is broken then. Thanks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
hellvinz
Joined: 03 Apr 2011
Posts: 2
Location: Paris
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 3:03 am Post subject: DRBD |
|
|
I've tried to reboot yesterday on the 2.6.38 kernel and the drbd device didn't show up as if it hasn't been compiled while it was there in the two latest revisions.
I rolled back to last revision (2.6.35) and everything worked again,
didn't tried since.
Have you removed it in your latest config?
Regards
Vincent |
|
| Back to top |
|
mnordhoff
Joined: 03 May 2008
Posts: 451
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 3:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| This post is vague to the point of uselessness, but a couple days ago someone popped in IRC saying something or other might be missing from 2.6.38. It was never 100% confirmed, and I don't remember what it was now, though... |
|
| Back to top |
|
obs
Joined: 07 Mar 2010
Posts: 1400
Location: Earth
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 6:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Probably related to this this post? http://forum.linode.com/viewtopic.php?t=6865&highlight=tun the 64 bit kernels don't have tun built in. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
