Linode Forum
https://forum.linode.com/

email server load
https://forum.linode.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4520
Page 1 of 1

Author:  kuyaedz [ Tue Aug 18, 2009 12:09 am ]
Post subject:  email server load

I'm wondering if anyone is running a dedicated email server on their linodes. I've got email running on two of mine now, but its just for a few users. What I'm wondering is how many active email accounts do you think a linode can handle and at what size? In other words, can anyone give me a better idea of the load a dedicated email server can expect at 50, 100, 200 accounts?

Author:  sleddog [ Tue Aug 18, 2009 5:53 am ]
Post subject: 

I don't think that the number of mail accounts is the key factor. Most important is the way mail is handled after receipt -- spam and virus scanning are much more intensive activities (with respect to CPU and memory) than the actual delivery of messages.

Author:  kuyaedz [ Tue Aug 18, 2009 9:32 am ]
Post subject: 

The reason I ask is that I have a client that would like me to build them a dedicated email server as an off-site managed service. I'd like to go with linode, I just need to make sure it'll be able to handle 100, 200, 300 accounts.

Author:  Stever [ Tue Aug 18, 2009 10:51 am ]
Post subject: 

I think that a few hundred email accounts will be no problem as far as CPU and memory go, but you may find the disk space on linode to be a problem. With free email accounts offering multiple gigs of storage, many users expect to be able to leave lots of mail on the server indefinitely. I would consider the amount of storage you expect to allocate per user and see if that will fit within a linode that is within your budget.

Author:  pclissold [ Tue Aug 18, 2009 10:51 am ]
Post subject: 

The limiting factor is the rate of email deliveries and the mail processing that you do on the Linode. Things like SpamAssassin and clamav use a lot of memory and CPU. If you are going to use them on a system that processes al lot of mail, you need a big Linode.

Author:  jed [ Tue Aug 18, 2009 11:25 am ]
Post subject: 

pclissold wrote:
Things like SpamAssassin and clamav use a lot of memory and CPU.

I'll second that. I'm running an IMAP proxy for my @linode.com mail, and that entails a getmail process which forks a spamd check per message. Needless to say, @linode.com gets a lot of mail -- I noticed the performance difference at once.

Author:  Vance [ Tue Aug 18, 2009 11:27 pm ]
Post subject: 

Some non-resource-intensive ways to filter e-mail:

Stever has a good point about storage space. If you run an IMAP server with users who don't delete their old mail, it's probably not going to take too long to start filling up.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC-04:00
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/