Linode Forum
Linode Community Forums
 FAQFAQ    SearchSearch    MembersMembers      Register Register 
 LoginLogin [ Anonymous ] 
Post new topic  Reply to topic
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 09, 2009 7:11 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 65
Website: http://www.skafari.com
Neither is better than the other. I continue to use both and find both to be of good value. Linode gives you more bang for your buck for sure. With slicehost you know you have Rackspace behind the company so there is peace of mind, plus they have backups and nifty iphone apps.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 09, 2009 11:49 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 6:54 pm
Posts: 833
fos wrote:
// Another concern with Linux and Unix is that time is represented as number of seconds past 1/1/1970 and 32 bits to store this time will run out sometime in 2032.

Not another Y2K !!!!!

Jeff :)


Well, Tue Jan 19 03:14:07 2038 GMT is when time_t (32bit) rolls over.

I really hope I'm not working then; Y2K was sufficiently boring; don't want to have to deal with both of them.

_________________
Rgds
Stephen
(Linux user since kernel version 0.11)


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 10, 2009 1:29 am 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 65
Website: http://www.skafari.com
Since other companies are starting to support ipv6 I think it would be great for linode to start supporting this in Dallas and Fremont...


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 10, 2009 1:37 am 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 4:01 pm
Posts: 568
Website: http://www.mattnordhoff.com/
RossH wrote:
Since other companies are starting to support ipv6 I think it would be great for linode to start supporting this in Dallas and Fremont...


As a workaround, you can use a tunnel. There are tunnel servers near all of the data centers.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 22, 2009 4:31 am 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 4:22 am
Posts: 3
Quote:
Is there any reason to not pick the 64 bit OS?

I wonder the same. The only reason I can think of is that 32 bit uses a bit less memory.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 22, 2009 4:43 am 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 6:26 pm
Posts: 58
Website: http://blog.shadypixel.com/
Mark_M wrote:
Quote:
Is there any reason to not pick the 64 bit OS?

I wonder the same. The only reason I can think of is that 32 bit uses a bit less memory.


That's the only reason, but it's kind of an important one. Memory is the first resource you're likely to run out of pretty much regardless of what you're doing with your linode.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 22, 2009 5:11 am 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 4:01 pm
Posts: 568
Website: http://www.mattnordhoff.com/
Mark_M wrote:
Quote:
Is there any reason to not pick the 64 bit OS?

I wonder the same. The only reason I can think of is that 32 bit uses a bit less memory.


Alternate question: is there any reason to pick a 64-bit OS?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 5:49 pm 
Offline
Senior Newbie

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 10:41 pm
Posts: 6
Location: San Antonio, TX
Quote:
Alternate question: is there any reason to pick a 64-bit OS?


I'm guessing that when people say "the 64-bit OS is 'faster'" they're talking about the increase (doubling?) of general purpose registers available in 64-bit mode. This would be one reason.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 6:05 pm 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 5:22 pm
Posts: 3
Pryon wrote:
Quote:
Alternate question: is there any reason to pick a 64-bit OS?


I'm guessing that when people say "the 64-bit OS is 'faster'" they're talking about the increase (doubling?) of general purpose registers available in 64-bit mode. This would be one reason.


I've noticed that 64-bit is also "faster" because the distros compile it against the newer processors. So instead of compiling against an ancient i386, they are compiled for x86_64 with better optimizations.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 2:35 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 10:49 pm
Posts: 70
ICQ: 4155271
Website: http://mikeage.net
WLM: msn@mikeage.net
Yahoo Messenger: m_i_k_e_miller
AOL: MikeageCM
Location: Israel
Mark_M wrote:
Quote:
Is there any reason to not pick the 64 bit OS?

I wonder the same. The only reason I can think of is that 32 bit uses a bit less memory.


I don't know if it's so little.

My PHP processes (fastcgi) dropped from a max of ~60MB per process to ~35MB each when I went from 64 bit to 32 bit.

I'm not sure why the drop was so dramatic; it's Ubuntu Jaunty's release of php5 (I don't recall the version offhand) + APC (32MB cache).

Most other processes also shrunk, but not by very much.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:33 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 1691
Location: Montreal, QC
The question isn't "Is there any reason to not pick the 64 bit OS?", but "Is there any reason to pick the 64 bit OS?"

64-bit gives you higher memory usage, and if you have under 4GB of RAM, few benefits if any. I don't think there's really anything a typical server does that would get a speed boost from 64-bit computing.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 4:13 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 7:18 pm
Posts: 562
Location: Austin
http://www.tuxradar.com/content/ubuntu- ... benchmarks


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 5:12 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 8:44 pm
Posts: 1121
Xan wrote:
http://www.tuxradar.com/content/ubuntu-904-32-bit-vs-64-bit-benchmarks

Great link, thanks. To sum it up: it depends on what you do with your Linode. 64-bit can be twice as fast in some operations, but more or less the same in others.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 5:27 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 1:18 am
Posts: 681
hybinet wrote:
Great link, thanks. To sum it up: it depends on what you do with your Linode. 64-bit can be twice as fast in some operations, but more or less the same in others.

Note that the referenced page doesn't cover memory usage at all (as earlier highlighted in this thread), which can easily trump CPU gains in a general purpose host, especially in a VPS environment where memory is far more constrained, and overflowing to disk a much higher penalty in terms of performance.

-- David


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:18 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:13 am
Posts: 176
grsecurity only works in pv_grub-64, it will segfault on pv_grub-32.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
RSS

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group