Linode Forum
Linode Community Forums
 FAQFAQ    SearchSearch    MembersMembers      Register Register 
 LoginLogin [ Anonymous ] 
Post new topic  Reply to topic
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 7:38 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 8:44 pm
Posts: 1121
bji wrote:
The s3fs project that you've linked to provides a really bare-bones FUSE filesystem for s3 that is missing many features. It's not POSIX compliant because it's lacking lots of POSIX features (such as hard links). It also uses some cheap hacks such as, whenever any file is to be written to S3, it writes it to a /tmp file first and then uploads that. This limits the files you can write to S3 by the size of your /tmp partition and also introduces the possibility of random strange errors in writing to S3 that are due to out-of-disk space issues locally. Also, the s3fs code quality is not good.

I was hoping to do something much more complete ...


Sounds fantastic! I'll definitely give it a try sometime soon. Honestly, s3fs sucks.....


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 4:46 pm 
Offline
Junior Member

Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 6:25 pm
Posts: 26
I'm also concerned that my future site will be disk-space bound instead of memory or bandwidth.

You can buy a HD for $100-$200. It'd be nice if you could just write a check for $200 to get a new HD added to your Linode! (If necessary.) Or, have a slower but bigger network drive.

However, 12GB should be more than enough for me, unless my site winds up spectacularly successful.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 5:02 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 4:01 pm
Posts: 568
Website: http://www.mattnordhoff.com/
hybinet wrote:
Xan wrote:
Ooh, that would be nice.

I'm on two different Linode 540 hosts at the moment, in two different datacenters, and both report 137040 MB free. Is that the limit that will be displayed, or is that a big coincidence?

The host I'm on has more free space than that. Maybe your coincidence is due to the fact that both hosts are full?

(18 x 1024M x 30) + 137040M = 690000M

It's a nicely rounded number which we don't often see in computers, so the limit is likely to be by design. And it's just a few gigs shy of the usual capacity of a 750GB hard drive :P


FWIW, hosts have two hard drives in RAID 1. Depending on the age of the host, they may be 500 GB, 750 GB or 1 TB.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
RSS

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group