Linode Forum
Linode Community Forums
 FAQFAQ    SearchSearch    MembersMembers      Register Register 
 LoginLogin [ Anonymous ] 
Post new topic  Reply to topic
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun May 30, 2004 8:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 30, 2004 8:22 pm
Posts: 1
Location: Louisiana, USA
I am considering using Linode for a web and email server. I would like to run Gentoo. Will the Linode 64 be sufficient?


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon May 31, 2004 12:42 pm 
Offline
Senior Newbie

Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 6:59 pm
Posts: 7
On my linode 64 I run web and email with no problem. But that's probably only because it's just me and my immediate family that use it. it really depends on the load you're expecting.

I run Apache with PHP running a photo gallery and phpwiki. For mail I run exim, uw-imap and IMP as web mail (including calendar).


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 31, 2004 1:48 pm 
Thanks for the response....

Why have you chosen Exim over Sendmail or Postfix? And how does UW-IMAP perform? Thanks.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 31, 2004 2:15 pm 
Offline
Senior Newbie

Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 6:59 pm
Posts: 7
exim is mainly because that's what we use at work, so I can get support from there, plus I want to learn what we use there.

uw-imap is trivial to install and performs with no problems whatsoever. But keep in mind that the load on my server is minimal, so it's not really a good benchmark.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 01, 2004 9:47 am 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 9:18 pm
Posts: 116
Website: http://michael.susens-schurter.com/
WLM: mschurter@yahoo.com
Yahoo Messenger: mschurter
Location: Peoria, IL
[off-topic] uw-imap? i've never used it but only read bad things... but hey, if it isn't broken, don't fix it [/off-topic]

the real question is what are you using the site & e-mail for? if it's a low traffic personal site with only a few e-mails, sure - use the 64. just don't expect fast response times under moderate loads.

but if you're going to be writing huge inefficient php pages which crunch mysql databases and regularly exchange e-mails with 1 meg attachments... go for the 96. memory can quickly become the bottleneck especially if the services you're running don't scale well.

I have a 96 with a bunch of low traffic services, and disk IO is definately the bottleneck. my swap is only lightly touched, but even that is enough to bring the system to a crawl if there's another IO intensive task running.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
RSS

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group