| Linode Forum https://forum.linode.com/ |
|
| Most people running own DNS server, or using outside server? https://forum.linode.com/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=900 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Clapper [ Thu May 27, 2004 11:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Most people running own DNS server, or using outside server? |
Wondering if most people run their own, or use an outside server. I currently use a free domain service called itsyourdomain.com, but, I'm wondering if maybe my site would be more responsive if I actually ran a DNS server on my node. thoughts? |
|
| Author: | NecroBones [ Fri May 28, 2004 12:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I run my own, but that's partly because I'm running authoritative nameservice for my own zones. Local caching will always be more responsive, IMHO, than remote caching, but depending on who you're using for DNS lookups, the difference may be negligible. |
|
| Author: | lcannell [ Fri May 28, 2004 5:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I use DNSMadeEasy. Pricing is incredible (50 domains cost $30/year), they run five DNS servers, and the service includes http redirects which I find very handy. The management interface is really good too. http://www.dnsmadeeasy.com |
|
| Author: | tetranz [ Sat May 29, 2004 6:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
My domains are registered at GoDaddy and my needs are fairly simple (A, MX and CNAMEs) so I've been happy with the free dns services that GoDaddy bundle with domain registration. They also provide free http redirection and email forwarding if you want it. Cheers Ross |
|
| Author: | GT3NE1 [ Wed Sep 08, 2004 3:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I was too lazy to setup DNS when I first bought my linode a couple of months ago, so I just went to Dotster.com (my registrar) and bought their services for a year. $10. Plan to run my own when it expires. |
|
| Author: | rko [ Wed Sep 08, 2004 6:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I have some domains in GoDaddy only, and some mixed with zoneedit.com+linode (=have 3 NS records for the domain). If you want more reliability you can set your linode to be slave with your primary DNS provider and have all the servers be your NS. Or other way around. Risto |
|
| Author: | darko [ Thu Apr 28, 2005 2:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I registered my domains with joker.com and have been using their DNS hosting service that's free when you register a domain. They also do http forwarding and email forwarding with spam filters and havent had a problem with them. |
|
| Author: | astro [ Thu Apr 28, 2005 11:44 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I'm using tinydns. It was fairly easy to set up. The main thing I like about doing my own is that I can do it all directly on my machine like everything else. I can back it up, etc. I did it through godaddy.com before, and that was very flexible and easy, but I learned a lot more doing it myself. It definately took me a few nights to figure out, though. Another benefit was that after I learned how to do it on my linode I was able to set up a local nameserver for my home network. -austin |
|
| Author: | mastabog [ Thu Apr 28, 2005 12:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I'm using servercentral.net ... DNS services free, http redirection, email forwarding, instant DNS updates, straight forward web interface ... been there for over 2 years. |
|
| Author: | Sipherx [ Thu Apr 28, 2005 11:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I use sitelutions.com unlimited domains, totally free 5 nameserver with 99.9 percent uptime. Never has been down for me yet. Check em out |
|
| Author: | ywliu [ Fri Apr 29, 2005 7:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I use zoneedit.com for 5 free domains. I have been using there service for a few years and not bad. |
|
| Author: | dmohs [ Mon May 02, 2005 2:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | Redundancy |
It bothers me that InterNic requires two nameservers. If I have one web server, I don't need two nameservers. That is, if the server goes down, I don't really care if clients can't resolve the domain name. In fact, in some cases it would be best if they could not. The requirement seems poorly thought through. |
|
| Author: | kangaby [ Mon May 02, 2005 8:46 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redundancy |
dmohs wrote: It bothers me that InterNic requires two nameservers. If I have one web server, I don't need two nameservers.
I have to agree. I run my own DNS server. Depending on who you register your domain with you can register 2 nameservers both using the same IP address. This keeps InterNic happy. I don't need a backup DNS, because if the server with my DNS goes down, the web / mail won't be working anyway. |
|
| Author: | OverlordQ [ Mon May 02, 2005 1:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
We run our own DNS, although it's not good practice I host my DNS on my linode in freemont with my website since if the box is down they wont be able to get to my site anyways so DNS doesn't really matter. But for the one my friends and I share that's in ThePlanet it is also running as master for it's zones and then my linode in Freemont is running as a slave for backup. |
|
| Author: | Jay [ Mon May 02, 2005 7:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
OverlordQ wrote: We run our own DNS, although it's not good practice I host my DNS on my linode in freemont with my website since if the box is down they wont be able to get to my site anyways so DNS doesn't really matter. But for the one my friends and I share that's in ThePlanet it is also running as master for it's zones and then my linode in Freemont is running as a slave for backup.
I have Backup MX, so DNS while my linode is down is *very* important. Also important to note, DNS lookup failures usually are an immediate bounce, but "timeout" errors usually get a few retries. Food for thought. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC-04:00 |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|