Linode Forum
Linode Community Forums
 FAQFAQ    SearchSearch    MembersMembers      Register Register 
 LoginLogin [ Anonymous ] 
Post new topic  Reply to topic
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2004 4:18 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 12:49 am
Posts: 333
http://www.nomorepasting.com/paste.php?pasteID=14770

bind proceeds to eat all the cpu.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2004 4:28 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 12:49 am
Posts: 333
looks like the first error is here:

http://www.nomorepasting.com/paste.php?pasteID=14771


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 21, 2004 6:30 pm 
Offline
Linode Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 6:24 pm
Posts: 3090
Website: http://www.linode.com/
Location: Galloway, NJ
"page allocation failure" usually means you're out of RAM+swap.

Check "cat /proc/swaps" to see if that's the case.

-Chris


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 27, 2004 7:36 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 12:49 am
Posts: 333
Switched to the lastest 2.4 kernel you offer and I haven't had the problem since.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 14, 2004 2:35 pm 
Offline
Senior Newbie

Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 7:58 pm
Posts: 6
Website: http://stephen.evilcoder.com
Now that I've switched to kernel 2.6 to get filesystem ACLs, I've been noticing that someone of my bind9 processes have started eating all of my CPU after awhile. Since the links in the original post are no longer active, I can only assume that I'm experiencing the same problem.

Anybody know how I can fix this w/o switching back to kernel 2.4? I really do need filesystem ACLs.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 14, 2004 3:12 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2003 3:51 pm
Posts: 965
Location: Netherlands
Have you disabled thread local storage? Bind is usually the first thing to cause problems on a Linode that is running with TLS enabled.
Code:
mv /lib/tls /lib/tls-disabled

UML does not support NPTL/TLS under 2.4 or 2.6. The difference in the way the TLS problem manifests itself (or not) with 2.4 and 2.6 kernels is because NPTL enabled /lib/ld.so checks 'uname' in 2.4 kernels. If extraversion begins with "-nptl" then the 2.4 kernel has NPTL (and TLS) support. If extraversion doesn't have that string, ld.so assumes that the kernel doesn't have NPTL (or TLS) support (the Linode 2.4 case). If the kernel is >=2.6, then ld.so just assumes that NPTL (and TLS) support is present, so things start to go haywire under UML, where this assumption is invalid.

_________________
/ Peter


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 14, 2004 8:23 pm 
Offline
Senior Newbie

Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 7:58 pm
Posts: 6
Website: http://stephen.evilcoder.com
Yes, I've disabled TLS. bind is still behaving strangely.

Here's a top display of my named when it goes crazy:
Code:
PID  USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND           
8121 bind      25   0 11192 1252 4160 R 98.9  2.1  47:27.35 named


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
RSS

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group