Linode Forum
Linode Community Forums
 FAQFAQ    SearchSearch    MembersMembers      Register Register 
 LoginLogin [ Anonymous ] 
Post new topic  Reply to topic
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 8:51 am 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 8:00 am
Posts: 3
Hey,

I`m using my VPS as a socks5 proxy via ssh for secure surfing.

When I try to search google while the proxy is enabled, I get a message from google:

Quote:
We're sorry...

... but your computer or network may be sending automated queries. To protect our users, we can't process your request right now.

See Google Help for more information.


My VPS is in Dallas, TX Facilitate.

Is there a way to fix this problem?

TNX,
asaf


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 9:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2013 8:59 am
Posts: 1
I had the same issue. It's caused by linodes ipv6 being blocked by google

But not to worry, this is easy to fix:
1) Open support ticket to get a /64 of ipv6
2) set up the ipv6 with your own block http://library.linode.com/networking/ipv6
3) no more issues!

fixed it for me very nicely :D


(stealing heckman's solution on irc) >.>


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 2:58 am 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 8:00 am
Posts: 3
Hey,

I got from the Linode support and IPv6 pool and I restarted my machine and got the following:

eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 04:01:05:4f:2f:01
inet addr:192.241.171.164 Bcast:192.241.171.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::601:5ff:fe4f:2f01/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:264601 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:195706 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:188900357 (188.9 MB) TX bytes:127530601 (127.5 MB)

# ip -6 addr show eth0
3: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qlen 1000
inet6 2600:3c00::f03c:91ff:fedf:532f/64 scope global dynamic
valid_lft 2591489sec preferred_lft 604289sec
inet6 fe80::f03c:91ff:fedf:532f/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever



But, I still get the Google Captcha...
Do I need to attach another address from the pool or something?


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 3:07 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2012 3:40 am
Posts: 56
Website: http://for-no-reason.net
Location: Australia
You need to add some of the ip's from your pool first


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 7:51 am 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 8:00 am
Posts: 3
Thank you.

I added the New address with the command:

ip -6 addr add 2600:3c00:e000:0044::1/64 dev eth0

But now I got 2 IPv6 Address assigne to the eth0 interface:

eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr f2:3c:91:df:53:2f
inet addr:198.58.116.104 Bcast:198.58.116.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: 2600:3c00::f03c:91ff:fedf:532f/64 Scope:Global
inet6 addr: fe80::f03c:91ff:fedf:532f/64 Scope:Link
inet6 addr: 2600:3c00:e000:44::1/64 Scope:Global


How do I set that all the traffic will go throgh the "new" IPv6 only?


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Aug 28, 2013 5:17 am 
Offline
Senior Newbie

Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 11:20 pm
Posts: 7
You can disable ipv6 and only use ipv4. This got rid of the google messages for me.


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Apr 22, 2014 6:42 am 
Offline
Senior Newbie

Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2014 8:56 am
Posts: 11
Ah! Could this be why ripe.net have permanently banned "my" ipv6 address for making "too many queries" (via fail2ban)? I have a feeling that would explain that, as it certainly wasn't making thousands of queries per day on its own (maybe about 10 as I've set up detection of some spam bots), but if ripe.net is seeing the whole Linode customer base as a single source then it's another story.

Is it a bad thing to just disable IPv6 altogether? I'd love to be proactive and do my part for its adoption, but it seems to still have more problems than it's worth, and things like fail2ban don't support it anyway.
It's that or ask for my own block. It seems wasteful to me if no one is using it. Apparently we'll "never run out" of ipv6 addresses, but if we're handing out millions at a time I can see that claim being a bit like the Titanic being "unsinkable" and 640K being enough for anyone ;)


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:53 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 1691
Location: Montreal, QC
There are approximately 10^38 possible IPv6 addresses. If you gave 64 bits worth of IP addresses to every person on earth (that's 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 addresses each), you will have consumed about .00000004 % of all IP addresses.


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Apr 22, 2014 4:17 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2003 3:51 pm
Posts: 965
Location: Netherlands
Guspaz wrote:
There are approximately 10^38 possible IPv6 addresses. If you gave 64 bits worth of IP addresses to every person on earth (that's 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 addresses each), you will have consumed about .00000004 % of all IP addresses.


But… https://xkcd.com/865/

_________________
/ Peter


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2014 9:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 9:54 pm
Posts: 1
I encountered the same issue here. So I took the advice to disable IPv6. It worked.

I'm using debian as OS. so here are the links told me how to do it.
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianIPv6#How_to_turn_off_IPv6
http://superuser.com/questions/546788/h ... ian-wheezy


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
RSS

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group