Linode Forum
Linode Community Forums
 FAQFAQ    SearchSearch    MembersMembers      Register Register 
 LoginLogin [ Anonymous ] 
Post new topic  Reply to topic
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Oct 24, 2013 11:54 am 
Offline
Senior Newbie

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 7:55 am
Posts: 13
Hi everyone

I don't usually cross-post, but in this case, thought it would be pertinent to see whether any Linode forum users (not on Serverfault) have already considered the following options for filesystems on their Linodes?

Please respond on Serverfault, if possible, thanks. I'll post the winning answer here too.

http://serverfault.com/questions/548375 ... ning-linux


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Oct 27, 2013 9:25 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 4:11 pm
Posts: 554
Website: http://www.unixtastic.com
Location: Europe
Considered and rejected. Stability is worth a lot more than performance for most applications. I don't really trust ZFS on linux (although it is great on FreeBSD) and XFS is too memory hungry.

Stick to ext3 or maybe ext4 if extents are worth breaking Linode's disk resizing for.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2013 11:24 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 1691
Location: Montreal, QC
I'd trust ZFS on Linux more than btrfs :)

I think it depends what you're doing. ZFSonLinux is considered stable at this point, and it's probably suitable for anything short of critical systems.

ZFS loves RAM, though. It runs best on systems with a ton of it. This alone may make it poorly suited to Linodes. The rule of thumb is something like 1GB per TB of storage (although I'm violating that with 44TB of storage on 24GB of RAM), and you're not going to hit that on a Linode, but I still would not run ZFS on a system with less than 4GB of RAM.

Also, do not run ZFS on a 32-bit kernel. It almost needs the wider virtual address space, even if you don't have more than 4GB of RAM.


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2013 5:08 am 
Offline
Senior Newbie

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 7:55 am
Posts: 13
Thank you both for your feedback, it's appreciated.

I'm after data integrity and ease of snapshots for backing up with minimum effect on a running system, so will be testing the following thoroughly before taking any action on my live servers:

1. ZFS on a 4GB Linode, using ditto blocks, without RAIDZ, for obvious reasons, as stated in my response to the accepted answer on serverfault.com: http://bit.ly/1fXHimb. Linode have confirmed that the disk cloning mechanism will work with any filesystem; the only loss in features will be the inability to resize, or use the built-in backup add-on via Linode Manager.

2. SmartOS and Linux on Joyent's ZFS backed cloud. SmartOS looks very appealing from the perspective of the requirements outlined in this post, but their prices are considerably higher than Linode's. Joyent will be releasing the ability to install custom Linux images early next year, so that will also give me the ability to run Slackware with ZFS on what they claim is "bare metal" ZFS.

I hope to report back on my testing once complete.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
RSS

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group