Linode Forum
Linode Community Forums
 FAQFAQ    SearchSearch    MembersMembers      Register Register 
 LoginLogin [ Anonymous ] 
Post new topic  Reply to topic
Author Message
 Post subject: ext2 vs ext3 on a linode
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2003 2:38 am 
Offline
Junior Member

Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 12:58 am
Posts: 26
Website: http://www.symetrix.com
Is there any sense running ext3 (journaling fs) on top of what the host is running (most likely a journaling fs + raid)? Won't this slow down the disk I/O of the linode?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2003 4:25 am 
Offline
Linode Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 6:24 pm
Posts: 3090
Website: http://www.linode.com/
Location: Galloway, NJ
Running ext3 (or the like) will keep your files in a sane state when and if a crash occurs; it provides the same benefits as running ext3 on a "real" machine. There is more overhead with ext3 vs ext2, but under some workloads ext3 can be faster than ext2 (here we go :roll:).

Side note: Recently Jeff Dike (UML author) has been working on mmap'ed ubd device driver; which saves having to copy blocks/pages around which pollutes the cache and is less efficient than the mmap solution.

Are you seeing a performance problem?

-Chris


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2003 3:57 pm 
Offline
Junior Member

Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 12:58 am
Posts: 26
Website: http://www.symetrix.com
I was just thinking out loud. I'm not having any performance problems with disk I/O.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
RSS

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group