david_linode_forum wrote:
@chaos thank you for stating the obvious in a snotty tone.
I apologize for that, I've been a bit out of sync lately and took it out wrongly. This question gets asked too often and it must have triggered something.
Quote:
However manually cloning disk images <> automated rotating snapshots rsync'd offsite. automated file level offsite backup can be done on either host. combining the two means time to restore is that much shorter given a disaster in a world where speed does count.
Of course things like that would be great, but if you have noticed the difference between Linode is that you get more hardware for less money, however you forgo a few of the "easy things" like auto-backups and other things. In return, you get many more features than provided at the other host because you have more control over what goes in and what goes out.
I, personally, was debating on buying a Linode 1080 in every datacenter and offering a backup solution via the Private IP addressing so that less bandwidth is used and it would be a great service for all the linoders. This was until I heard about Linode soon to be providing a backup service.
_________________
If it ain't broke, you didn't tweak it enough. If it is broke, use more duct tape.
http://independentchaos.com