anderiv wrote:
Colo customers also pay a *premium* for that level of redundancy/reliability.
I'm not saying that the linode folks don't deserve some ribbing for this, or that customers don't deserve some credit on their accounts. Rather, just trying to provide some perspective on the issue. If you need umpteen nines of reliability, then linode probably isn't the service for you. For the rest of us, it's pretty dang good. I've been a customer since 2004, and since that time, the number of issues like this can be counted on say, 2 fingers. Pretty damn good if you ask me. While any amount of downtime sucks, this afternoon's incident surely isn't going to turn me away from Linode. Once the dust settles, I'm sure that we'll get an explanation from caker, as well as some credit on our accounts is likely as well.
totally agree. i came from a shared hosting environment (dreamhost) that had one nine worth of uptime. since moving here to linode in april, outside of today's 30m of downtime, the rest of the downtime was caused by my own stupidity. i won't be leaving linode anytime soon. that said, it was kind of irksome to suddenly without warning lose my vps.