If you read the quote carefully, it says it currently points to a Linode.

-Chris

Will you guys release more information? Like whether this was a malicious user or someone who was compromised?

Normally, few companies would reveal any information like that. Although, in this case, with both Adobe and Google publicly pointing the finger at China, this is anything but a normal case.

I may have misread (it isn't entirely clear) but my read of it is that a dynamic DNS hostname was involved, and that hostname now points to a Linode. Maybe it was parked, maybe it was recycled.. But there's no claim that a Linode was involved in the actual attack.

I've been getting several brute force SSH attacks on my Fremont node from either Atlanta or Femont. :\

Most notably: 74.207.232.105 (li74-105.members.linode.com)

I'm very interested to hear where this investigation has gone. It would help the company if you could prove that they weren't using Linode servers to launch these attacks.

rainycity10: More likely a Linode was rooted, making Linode as much of a victim here as the other companies.

If you're getting attacked by Linodes, please email logs to abuse@linode.com. Unlike some ISPs, Linode is actually responsive. That's why we use them!

Yes, I know that. This was the first time (January 9) I've seen a brute force attack from another Linode in my year and a half of being a Linode user. Just figured I'd mention it.



I'll do that next time. It seems like the host who attacked me no longer exists (or at least pinging doesn't work).

I didn't know Caker was chinese?

Well he wouldn't be a very effective spy if we knew!

(Kidding, kidding!)

I read your email.

Ah, but you are still awake -so you didn't read any of mine.

James

Good, can I get you to reply to it as well?