Guspaz wrote:
I think he was probably more surprised that anybody still uses pico instead of nano. Most people switched because Pico is not free software, and nano has a lot more features.
I'm surprised that pico is still in repos, mainly because its not free software and there's a free software alternative out there (nano) that is installed by default in a lot of things.
I remember, years ago, when I used alpine and pico. Then I think it was Gentoo that was all "Do not use pico. Use nano." Granted, years ago, I was on an ISP that offered shell access via Solaris boxes, and PPP was experimental.

I WAS THE FIRST OF MY FRIENDS TO GET SLIP!