Linode Forum
Linode Community Forums
 FAQFAQ    SearchSearch    MembersMembers      Register Register 
 LoginLogin [ Anonymous ] 
Post new topic  Reply to topic
Author Message
 Post subject: FFMPEG + Ubuntu
PostPosted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 7:48 pm 
Offline
Senior Newbie

Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 5:43 am
Posts: 7
Good Day,

I am having problems installing FFMPEG on Ubuntu 10.04. I followed this http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p= ... count=1289 but no luck.

Has anyone installed ffmpeg on ubuntu successfully. I need help.

========================= Installation results ===========================
Makefile:1: config.mak: No such file or directory
libavutil/Makefile:1: libavutil/../config.mak: No such file or directory
libavutil/../subdir.mak:96: warning: overriding commands for target `libavutil/'
libavutil/../subdir.mak:26: warning: ignoring old commands for target `libavutil/'
libavutil/../subdir.mak:96: warning: overriding commands for target `libavutil/'
libavutil/../subdir.mak:96: warning: ignoring old commands for target `libavutil/'
Makefile:232: /tests/fate.mak: No such file or directory
Makefile:233: /tests/fate2.mak: No such file or directory
Makefile:235: /tests/fate/aac.mak: No such file or directory
Makefile:236: /tests/fate/als.mak: No such file or directory
Makefile:237: /tests/fate/fft.mak: No such file or directory
Makefile:238: /tests/fate/h264.mak: No such file or directory
Makefile:239: /tests/fate/mp3.mak: No such file or directory
Makefile:240: /tests/fate/vorbis.mak: No such file or directory
Makefile:241: /tests/fate/vp8.mak: No such file or directory
make: *** No rule to make target `/tests/fate/vp8.mak'. Stop.

**** Installation failed. Aborting package creation.

Cleaning up...OK

Bye.


Any ideas how I can troubleshoot this.


Thank you,


Mark


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 8:11 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 1:18 am
Posts: 681
I assume you specifically don't want to use the existing repository version?

From the errors, could you perhaps have skipped a "configure" step? If I had to guess that seems the most likely point when those files would get created.

-- David


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:57 am 
Offline
Senior Newbie

Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 5:43 am
Posts: 7
Hi David,

you mean apt-get install ffmpeg? Again, I am a newbie and i just googled ffmpeg + ubuntu. Is it that simple? Will this install the available codecs and libraries?

Are there any differences from what is suggested in the ubuntu forum?

Very much appreciated.

-Mark


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 9:58 am 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 1:18 am
Posts: 681
mgoltra wrote:
you mean apt-get install ffmpeg? Again, I am a newbie and i just googled ffmpeg + ubuntu. Is it that simple? Will this install the available codecs and libraries?

Well, that's a broad question, since "available" in ffmpeg covers both internal support as well as optional support for various external libraries. I don't have a 10.04 system handy, so am not sure exactly what options were used in building the version of ffmpeg currently in the lucid package, but I suspect it'll have the bulk of those available. You could always just install it and then check "ffmpeg -formats" to see if it has any that you need and/or was built with whatever other libraries (mp3lame, x264, etc...) you might want.

Quote:
Are there any differences from what is suggested in the ubuntu forum?

Sure - that post was how to install the latest version from source, including some specific other libraries, so it'll have any changes that aren't in the distribution repository yet. For example, looks like lucid/10.04 has ffmpeg 0.5.1 at the moment, whereas the latest source trees are 0.5.3 for the 0.5 branch, and 0.6.1 for the 0.6 branch. That only matters if you need features from the later version for your specific purpose.

It's just that building from source is a bit more work - and ffmpeg is a fairly complex package - than just installing your distribution version, so if the latter is sufficient for your needs, it could be easier. But there's nothing wrong with doing a source install if you can manage the process. (And again, if you walk back through the steps you were talking, I expect you'll find a "configure" step was accidentally missed)

-- David


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 3:20 pm 
Offline
Senior Newbie

Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 5:43 am
Posts: 7
David,

Thank you again for you insight. I will give it a try. Is there anything else I have to do if I use apt-get install ffmpeg?


Thank you,

Mark


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 5:14 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 1:18 am
Posts: 681
In terms of getting ffmpeg installed, no, I don't think there should be anything more.

Whether the resulting ffmpeg has all the capabilities and/or features that you want (as opposed to the latest source package) is something only you can answer for yourself.

-- David


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
RSS

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group