Linode Forum
Linode Community Forums 		 FAQFAQ    SearchSearch    MembersMembers      Register Register 
 LoginLogin [ Anonymous ] 
Post new topic  Reply to topic

Board index » Linux Community Forums » General Discussion
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
sblantipodi
PostPosted: Sun Feb 27, 2011 7:47 am 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 1:32 pm
Posts: 737
Location: Italy
As title, I don't know when I started getting this warning
since I rebooted my linode only today since months.

But today, when I rebooted my linode I noticed this warning, here an image of the complete warning:

Image

What is it? I never seen this before on my VPS.
Top
   
Reply with quote  
obs
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 27, 2011 1:01 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 7:47 pm
Posts: 1970
Website: http://www.rwky.net
Location: Earth
What does
Code:
ls -lh /etc/udev/rules.d/
show?

_________________
Paid support
How to ask for help
1. Give details of your problem
2. Post any errors
3. Post relevant logs.
4. Don't hide details i.e. your domain, it just makes things harder
5. Be polite or you'll be eaten by a grue
Top
   
Reply with quote  
sblantipodi
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 27, 2011 1:46 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 1:32 pm
Posts: 737
Location: Italy
obs wrote:
What does
Code:
ls -lh /etc/udev/rules.d/
show?


Code:
total 64K
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  515 Aug  5  2010 05-udev-early.rules
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  948 Oct  4 21:45 40-multipath.rules
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  16K Aug  5  2010 50-udev.rules
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  471 Aug  5  2010 51-hotplug.rules
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  143 Jul  4  2009 60-net.rules
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.1K Jan  7  2007 60-pcmcia.rules
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  316 Jan 20  2010 60-raw.rules
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.9K Nov 18  2008 85-pcscd_ccid.rules
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   61 Aug  5  2010 90-dm.rules
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   82 Mar 31  2010 90-hal.rules
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  107 Aug  5  2010 95-pam-console.rules
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.3K Jul 14  2008 bluetooth.rules
Top
   
Reply with quote  
obs
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 27, 2011 2:23 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 7:47 pm
Posts: 1970
Website: http://www.rwky.net
Location: Earth
Well one of those is most likely the offender, not sure which since I don't have a centos image to compare to if you have another centos box that doesn't have the problem compare to two, or you could wait for someone here that has one to compare.

If you check the contents of each one you should be able to work out which is the offending one.

_________________
Paid support
How to ask for help
1. Give details of your problem
2. Post any errors
3. Post relevant logs.
4. Don't hide details i.e. your domain, it just makes things harder
5. Be polite or you'll be eaten by a grue
Top
   
Reply with quote  
sblantipodi
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 27, 2011 3:52 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 1:32 pm
Posts: 737
Location: Italy
obs wrote:
Well one of those is most likely the offender, not sure which since I don't have a centos image to compare to if you have another centos box that doesn't have the problem compare to two, or you could wait for someone here that has one to compare.

If you check the contents of each one you should be able to work out which is the offending one.


Explored all files but I haven't finded any "uneducated" lines that offends... :?
Top
   
Reply with quote  
sweh
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 27, 2011 5:01 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 6:54 pm
Posts: 833
Code:
a=`find /etc/udev -type f`
rpm --verify `rpm -qf $a | uniq` | grep udev

Any line will be something that has been modified since the rpm was installed.

Also,
Code:
cd /etc/udev
grep ATTRS */*

should return nothing

_________________
Rgds
Stephen
(Linux user since kernel version 0.11)
Top
   
Reply with quote  
sblantipodi
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 27, 2011 6:40 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 1:32 pm
Posts: 737
Location: Italy
sweh wrote:
Also,
Code:
cd /etc/udev
grep ATTRS */*

should return nothing


This helped a lot finding the lines that generated the warnings, commented them and the problem was solved.

THANKS!

what do you think that might added this lines to the udev rules?
Top
   
Reply with quote  
sweh
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 27, 2011 7:58 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 6:54 pm
Posts: 833
Show us a few example lines, and we might be able to make a guess. Otherwise it could be _anything_

_________________
Rgds

Stephen

(Linux user since kernel version 0.11)
Top
   
Reply with quote  
sblantipodi
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:15 am 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 1:32 pm
Posts: 737
Location: Italy
sweh wrote:
Show us a few example lines, and we might be able to make a guess. Otherwise it could be _anything_


this was the file that generated that warning:

Code:
# udev rules for pcscd and CCID readers

# Gemplus PCMCIA Card
#SUBSYSTEMS=="pcmcia", DRIVERS=="serial_cs", ACTION=="add", ATTRS{prod_id1}=="Gemplus", ATTRS{prod_id2}=="SerialPort", ATTRS{prod_id3}=="GemPC Card", RUN+="/usr/sbin/pcscd --hotplug"

# If not adding the device, go away
#ACTION!="add", GOTO="pcscd_ccid_rules_end"

# Kobil mIDentity
#SUBSYSTEMS=="usb", ATTRS{idVendor}=="0d46", ATTRS{idProduct}=="4081", RUN+="/usr/sbin/Kobil_mIDentity_switch"

# generic CCID device
#SUBSYSTEMS=="usb", ATTRS{bInterfaceClass}=="0b", RUN+="/usr/sbin/pcscd --hotplug"

# non CCID generic (InterfaceClass: 0xFF)
# CherrySmartTerminalST2XXX.txt
#SUBSYSTEMS=="usb", ATTRS{idVendor}=="046a", ATTRS{idProduct}=="003e", RUN+="/usr/sbin/pcscd --hotplug"
# DellSK-3106.txt
#SUBSYSTEMS=="usb", ATTRS{idVendor}=="413c", ATTRS{idProduct}=="2100", RUN+="/usr/sbin/pcscd --hotplug"
# MySmartPad.txt
#SUBSYSTEMS=="usb", ATTRS{idVendor}=="09be", ATTRS{idProduct}=="0002", RUN+="/usr/sbin/pcscd --hotplug"
# SCR331-DI-NTTCom.txt
#SUBSYSTEMS=="usb", ATTRS{idVendor}=="04e6", ATTRS{idProduct}=="5120", RUN+="/usr/sbin/pcscd --hotplug"
# SCR331-DI.txt
#SUBSYSTEMS=="usb", ATTRS{idVendor}=="04e6", ATTRS{idProduct}=="5111", RUN+="/usr/sbin/pcscd --hotplug"
# SDI010.txt
#SUBSYSTEMS=="usb", ATTRS{idVendor}=="04e6", ATTRS{idProduct}=="5121", RUN+="/usr/sbin/pcscd --hotplug"
# SPR532.txt
#SUBSYSTEMS=="usb", ATTRS{idVendor}=="04e6", ATTRS{idProduct}=="e003", RUN+="/usr/sbin/pcscd --hotplug"
# Verisign_secure_storage_token.txt
#SUBSYSTEMS=="usb", ATTRS{idVendor}=="08e6", ATTRS{idProduct}=="1359", RUN+="/usr/sbin/pcscd --hotplug"
# Verisign_secure_token.txt
#SUBSYSTEMS=="usb", ATTRS{idVendor}=="08e6", ATTRS{idProduct}=="ace0", RUN+="/usr/sbin/pcscd --hotplug"
# SchlumbergerSema Cyberflex Access e-gate
#SUBSYSTEMS=="usb", ATTRS{idVendor}=="0973", ATTRS{idProduct}=="0003", RUN+="/usr/sbin/pcscd --hotplug"

# All done
#LABEL="pcscd_ccid_rules_end"


the questions is, I'm using an enterprise distro, who asked to insert that lines in that file?
filename: 85-pcscd_ccid.rules
Top
   
Reply with quote  
sweh
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:41 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 6:54 pm
Posts: 833
I'm running CentOS 5.5 at home, and that bad line doesn't show up on my machine.

I have a CentOS 5.4 image at linode, and that file doesn't show up at all.

What is the output of
Code:
rpm -qf /etc/udev/rules.d/85*
rpm -f  /etc/udev/rules.d/85* --verify

_________________
Rgds

Stephen

(Linux user since kernel version 0.11)
Top
   
Reply with quote  
sblantipodi
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:54 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 1:32 pm
Posts: 737
Location: Italy
sweh wrote:
I'm running CentOS 5.5 at home, and that bad line doesn't show up on my machine.

I have a CentOS 5.4 image at linode, and that file doesn't show up at all.

What is the output of
Code:
rpm -qf /etc/udev/rules.d/85*
rpm -f  /etc/udev/rules.d/85* --verify


Code:
[root@xxx rules.d]# rpm -qf /etc/udev/rules.d/85*
pcsc-lite-ccid-1.3.10-1.el5.rf
[root@xxx rules.d]# rpm -f  /etc/udev/rules.d/85* --verify
S.5....T  c /etc/udev/rules.d/85-pcscd_ccid.rules
[root@xxx rules.d]#
Top
   
Reply with quote  
sweh
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 8:24 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 6:54 pm
Posts: 833
The "rf" in "pcsc-lite-ccid-1.3.10-1.el5.rf " appears to say that you installed a package from rpmforge, which isn't an official CentOS repository.

Which confuses me, slightly, since I can't find this on rpmforge. I've no idea where you got it from.

The 2nd line says the file was then changed since it was installed.

What does "rpm -qi pcsc-lite-ccid" say?

_________________
Rgds

Stephen

(Linux user since kernel version 0.11)
Top
   
Reply with quote  
sblantipodi
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 3:35 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 1:32 pm
Posts: 737
Location: Italy
sweh wrote:
What does "rpm -qi pcsc-lite-ccid" say?


Quote:
Name : pcsc-lite-ccid Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version : 1.3.10 Vendor: Dag Apt Repository, http://dag.wieers.com/apt/
Release : 1.el5.rf Build Date: Thu 24 Feb 2011 07:50:10 PM CET
Install Date: Sat 26 Feb 2011 08:54:44 AM CET Build Host: lisse.hasselt.wieers.com
Group : System Environment/Libraries Source RPM: pcsc-lite-ccid-1.3.10-1.el5.rf.src.rpm
Size : 665433 License: LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+
Signature : DSA/SHA1, Fri 25 Feb 2011 12:40:38 AM CET, Key ID a20e52146b8d79e6
Packager : Dag Wieers <dag@wieers.com>
URL : http://pcsclite.alioth.debian.org/ccid.html
Summary : Generic USB CCID smart card reader driver
Description :
Generic USB CCID (Chip/Smart Card Interface Devices) driver for use with the
PC/SC Lite daemon.
Top
   
Reply with quote  
sweh
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 8:05 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 6:54 pm
Posts: 833
So you've been installing packages from non-CentOS repositories. It claims you installed it:
Install Date: Sat 26 Feb 2011 08:54:44 AM CET
It's possible that rpm was bad and had incorrect lines for CentOS. It's also possible that you installed some other software that depended on it and they wrote bad lines.

Since you rebooted on the 27th, I'm gonna guess it was something you did around this time that caused the problem.

_________________
Rgds

Stephen

(Linux user since kernel version 0.11)
Top
   
Reply with quote  
LXicon
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 17, 2011 1:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 1:20 pm
Posts: 1
Website: http://lxicon.com/
Location: toronto
sweh wrote:
Code:
a=`find /etc/udev -type f`
rpm --verify `rpm -qf $a | uniq` | grep udev

Any line will be something that has been modified since the rpm was installed.

Also,
Code:
cd /etc/udev
grep ATTRS */*

should return nothing


THANKS!

i had to register to thank you for giving some helpful commands to diagnose this issue.

i had the same pcsc-lite-ccid package that sblantipodi had. i removed it with yum (along with coolkey and esc that were dependancies)
the messages are gone and those packages were not required for my server's specs.


* i have yum-priorities installed and have added repositories for epel-release and rpmforge-release with lower priorities than the CentOS repositories. the extra repositories were required for some applications that are not in CentOS.
Top
   
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic

Board index » Linux Community Forums » General Discussion


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
RSS

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group