Jackson1007 wrote:
Thanks for your help. I'm very new to development. But it seems odd to me that you give someone your code that you've been working on for a year and they can just go set it up elsewhere and use it. How is it possible to know someone you're just testing out. If you're interviewing someone for a job, do you give them the password to your alarm at your office and your password to your computer and say if we don't jire you please just forget what I gave you. Seems crazy to me. Of if you are interviewing nannies for your children do you just give them all the alarm code to your house and pray they never come back and use it?
No, but I also don't typically give potential developers access to the code. If I want to see what someone can do, I've got a pile of features/specs on the to-do list that can be developed and tested "in isolation."
Also, while we love our source code and it is very important to what we do, it is but a small part of what is required to reproduce our business. Without the writers, editors, salespeople, executive team, and readers, the source code is rather impotent.
Quote:
I can't believe no one has come up with a way to share code without allowing people to copy it. Lawyers and Investment Bankers often use digital "deal rooms" where potential acquirors can look at document but cannot download them or copy etc.. Maybe I can use one of those -but I have no clue how code is set up or if it can be displayed as documents can be.
Those are gimmicks, for reasons that should be obvious, but if not:
I'm not entirely sure what one might accomplish by giving someone the ability to
look at source code without being able to run it or edit it or thumb through it in their favorite IDE, but a walk-through demonstration of what the product does would probably be significantly more useful (and safer).
_________________
Code:
/* TODO: need to add signature to posts */