waldo wrote:
<snip>
No the problem with the version on the Android app market is that is it provided by a 3rd party individual. Not Linode. He may be trust worthy he may not. Unless I personally know him as either a close aquaintence or friend, I wouldn't use it. Unless an Android app is developed, released and supported by Linode I won't use it, open source or not.
I treat access to my Linode account like I do my bank accounts. I trust know one buy myself and the direct entity that I am doing business with.
<snip>
If it's open source, you can look at his code, and even compile it yourself. Such is the beauty of open source

waldo wrote:
We may get an app from Linode, but I doubt it'll be open source. I personally wouldn't care if it's open source or not, only that it's provided and supported by Linode.
glg wrote:
The issue here isn't linux, it's the linode manager, which is NOT open source. There is an API for access, which the android app uses), but my understanding is that the iphone app does not.
I personally stay away from anything that isn't open source (I'm actually more strict than that, I stick to Free(dom) Software). The only time I used the Linode manager was to attach my domains to my Linode and to deploy my VM. I do everything else directly on the VM via ssh and using F\OSS software.
If they do post an Android app, I will look for the source code first. It's not like they have to design it in a way to show personal data, they can use their own library to handle the encryption (encryption is the only exception to the F\OSS issue, as far as I'm concerned) as long as the rest of the app is F\OSS.