hoopycat wrote:
(I'll be back on as soon as I'm caught up with coursework ha ha hahaha why am I in the forums oh god I'm going to fail)
I know
exactly how you feel >.>.
hoopycat wrote:
So, something in the middle. Perhaps NFS to a massive NAS, or something involving
GlusterFS, or both. Or maybe the
rsync.net (Not Affiliated With
rsync Industries) model would work.
It would necessarily be slower than local storage, but that's OK, just as long as it's cheaper and won't impact core service reliability.
Anonymous HTTP access (e.g. S3-style static hosting, perhaps integrated with NodeBalancer?) would still be nice, for those folks still using Apache+mod_php, but... eh, screw 'em.
1. That ^, more or less. Cheaper, necessarily slower add-on storage option(s).
2. More/better short-term billing options. There's a handful of things I'd like to be able to test out on Linodes of varying sizes for a day or two at a time, but it's kind of a pain in the ass to do so at the moment.
3. A datacentre in Australia, or at least somewhere in SEA. In all honesty, dealing with the 200ms-ish latency with US servers isn't that bad for the most part, but it does ruin some otherwise cool ideas.