Linode Forum
Linode Community Forums 		 FAQFAQ    SearchSearch    MembersMembers      Register Register 
 LoginLogin [ Anonymous ] 
Post new topic  Reply to topic

Board index » Linux Community Forums » General Discussion
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
fiat
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 12:21 am 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 8:23 pm
Posts: 60
I'm finding the ping times to Tokyo1 are worse than Fremont. (220 vs 170ms)

I'm checking this from Sydney, I was wondering if there was anyone else from Oz that can post their results of tokyo1.

I know that the southern cross cable terminates practically on HE's front doorstep, but i'm thinking that the routes to toyko won't make it a viable option for hosting on the eastern seaboard of Oz.
Top
   
Reply with quote  
chesty
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 12:31 am 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 10:55 am
Posts: 164
tokyo 135ms
fremont 210ms

from iinet sydney
Top
   
Reply with quote  
iml
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 12:48 am 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:45 pm
Posts: 63
A traceroute would be more helpful in determining whether your packets are taking some screwy path. Here are the results from a looking glass in Sydney:

Code:
traceroute to tokyo1.linode.com (106.187.33.12), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
 1  192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1)  2.743 ms  2.919 ms  3.141 ms
 2  nexthop.nsw.iinet.net.au (203.55.231.88)  25.148 ms  29.653 ms  32.825 ms
 3  te7-1.syd-ult-bdr1.iinet.net.au (203.215.16.27)  37.523 ms  40.864 ms  45.235 ms
 4  xe-1-1-0-0.syd-ult-core1.iinet.net.au (203.215.20.30)  48.737 ms  53.293 ms  56.139 ms
 5  Bundle-Ether12.chw48.Sydney.telstra.net (139.130.0.137)  64.592 ms  67.645 ms  71.337 ms
 6  Bundle-Ether6.chw-core2.Sydney.telstra.net (203.50.6.153)  84.678 ms  31.413 ms  30.634 ms
 7  Bundle-Ether1.oxf-gw2.Sydney.telstra.net (203.50.6.90)  24.085 ms  25.990 ms  30.311 ms
 8  203.50.13.134 (203.50.13.134)  33.057 ms  37.379 ms  41.260 ms
 9  i-4-0-0.siko-core02.bx.reach.com (202.84.140.138)  164.064 ms  168.079 ms  171.660 ms
10  i-1-1-0.siko01.bi.reach.com (202.84.148.138)  176.448 ms  179.236 ms  183.915 ms
11  118.155.194.149 (118.155.194.149)  189.309 ms  192.149 ms  196.543 ms
12  otejbb203.kddnet.ad.jp (118.155.197.129)  200.279 ms otejbb203.kddnet.ad.jp (118.155.197.1)  143.319 ms otejbb204.kddnet.ad.jp (118.155.197.2)  143.265 ms
13  cm-fcu203.kddnet.ad.jp (124.215.194.164)  145.565 ms cm-fcu203.kddnet.ad.jp (124.215.194.180)  148.137 ms cm-fcu203.kddnet.ad.jp (124.215.194.164)  163.329 ms
14  124.215.199.122 (124.215.199.122)  156.955 ms  143.777 ms  143.470 ms
15  tokyo1.linode.com (106.187.33.12)  144.799 ms  148.531 ms  151.153 ms
Top
   
Reply with quote  
fiat
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 1:13 am 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 8:23 pm
Posts: 60
It looks like my route is passing through Fremont and heading back to Tokyo!

Tokyo
Code:
traceroute to tokyo1.linode.com (106.187.33.12), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  115.31.88.230 (115.31.88.230)  1.025 ms  1.120 ms  1.363 ms
 2  10.1.1.1 (10.1.1.1)  0.927 ms  0.905 ms  0.885 ms
 3  ge-0-0-0.169.bdr01.mel01.vic.VOCUS.net.au (114.31.197.105)  1.204 ms  1.183 ms  1.155 ms
 4  ge-0-0-2.bdr02.mel04.vic.VOCUS.net.au (114.31.196.33)  169.973 ms  169.962 ms  169.943 ms
 5  ge-0-0-3.bdr01.mel04.vic.VOCUS.net.au (114.31.196.34)  169.879 ms  169.880 ms  169.834 ms
 6  ge-1-0-6.cor01.syd03.nsw.VOCUS.net.au (114.31.192.82)  169.046 ms  169.282 ms  169.260 ms
 7  ten-1-3-0.cor02.syd03.nsw.VOCUS.net.au (114.31.192.87)  14.193 ms  14.180 ms  14.319 ms
 8  pos-1-2-2.bdr02.sjc01.ca.VOCUS.net.au (114.31.199.46)  169.445 ms  169.428 ms  169.410 ms
 9  10gigabitethernet3-2.core1.sjc1.he.net (64.71.184.45)  169.306 ms  169.849 ms  169.831 ms
10  10gigabitethernet2-3.core1.pao1.he.net (72.52.92.114)  170.328 ms  170.267 ms  170.198 ms
11  124.215.192.93 (124.215.192.93)  170.142 ms 124.215.192.81 (124.215.192.81)  181.087 ms 124.215.192.97 (124.215.192.97)  170.586 ms
12  pajbb002.kddnet.ad.jp (124.211.34.73)  169.453 ms pajbb001.kddnet.ad.jp (124.211.34.53)  170.045 ms pajbb001.kddnet.ad.jp (124.211.34.85)  169.994 ms
13  otejbb203.kddnet.ad.jp (203.181.100.5)  294.232 ms otejbb203.kddnet.ad.jp (203.181.100.209)  283.760 ms otejbb204.kddnet.ad.jp (203.181.100.201)  284.729 ms
14  cm-fcu203.kddnet.ad.jp (124.215.194.180)  288.256 ms cm-fcu203.kddnet.ad.jp (124.215.194.164)  288.240 ms cm-fcu203.kddnet.ad.jp (124.215.194.180)  292.974 ms
15  124.215.199.122 (124.215.199.122)  279.356 ms  285.749 ms  277.127 ms
16  tokyo1.linode.com (106.187.33.12)  275.822 ms  275.324 ms  285.960 ms


Fremont
Code:
traceroute to fremont1.linode.com (64.71.152.17), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  115.31.88.230 (115.31.88.230)  7.375 ms  8.166 ms  8.330 ms
 2  10.1.1.1 (10.1.1.1)  7.377 ms  7.346 ms  7.399 ms
 3  ge-0-0-0.169.bdr01.mel01.vic.VOCUS.net.au (114.31.197.105)  9.629 ms  9.619 ms  9.591 ms
 4  ge-0-0-2.bdr02.mel04.vic.VOCUS.net.au (114.31.196.33)  176.355 ms  176.351 ms  176.337 ms
 5  ge-0-0-3.bdr01.mel04.vic.VOCUS.net.au (114.31.196.34)  176.274 ms  176.276 ms  176.226 ms
 6  ge-1-0-6.cor01.syd03.nsw.VOCUS.net.au (114.31.192.82)  175.499 ms  169.604 ms  169.538 ms
 7  ten-1-3-0.cor02.syd03.nsw.VOCUS.net.au (114.31.192.87)  169.636 ms  169.616 ms  169.594 ms
 8  pos-1-2-2.bdr02.sjc01.ca.VOCUS.net.au (114.31.199.46)  169.337 ms  168.946 ms  168.927 ms
 9  pos-1-2-0.bdr01.sjc02.ca.VOCUS.net.au (114.31.199.118)  169.540 ms  169.528 ms  169.434 ms
10  10gigabitethernet2-3.core1.sjc2.he.net (206.223.116.37)  170.080 ms  170.761 ms  170.721 ms
11  10gigabitethernet1-1.core1.fmt1.he.net (72.52.92.109)  171.462 ms  171.437 ms  170.672 ms
12  linode-llc.10gigabitethernet2-3.core1.fmt1.he.net (64.62.250.6)  171.967 ms  170.534 ms  171.060 ms
13  fremont1.linode.com (64.71.152.17)  170.453 ms  170.432 ms  171.238 ms
Top
   
Reply with quote  
TheClient
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 3:54 am 
Offline
Junior Member

Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 4:22 am
Posts: 42
Does anyone has data for Singapore: Fremont vs Tokyo?
Top
   
Reply with quote  
iml
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 4:14 am 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:45 pm
Posts: 63
TheClient wrote:
Does anyone has data for Singapore: Fremont vs Tokyo?

http://traceroute.org/#Singapore

Code:
traceroute to tokyo1.linode.com (106.187.33.12), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
 1  202-150-221-169.rev.ne.com.sg (202.150.221.169)  0.584 ms  0.638 ms  0.706 ms
 2  s4-6-r10.cyberway.com.sg (203.117.6.209)  0.633 ms  0.679 ms  0.721 ms
 3  anutsi10.starhub.net.sg (203.118.3.226)  2.454 ms  2.448 ms  2.436 ms
 4  203.181.102.193 (203.181.102.193)  79.365 ms  79.375 ms  79.364 ms
 5  otejbb203.kddnet.ad.jp (59.128.7.129)  79.762 ms  80.029 ms  80.075 ms
 6  cm-fcu203.kddnet.ad.jp (124.215.194.164)  84.072 ms  83.321 ms  83.398 ms
 7  124.215.199.122 (124.215.199.122)  81.217 ms  81.407 ms  81.234 ms
 8  tokyo1.linode.com (106.187.33.12)  80.958 ms  80.869 ms  80.854 ms

Code:
traceroute to fremont1.linode.com (64.71.152.17), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
 1  202-150-221-169.rev.ne.com.sg (202.150.221.169)  0.337 ms  0.381 ms  0.429 ms
 2  s4-6-r10.cyberway.com.sg (203.117.6.209)  0.678 ms  0.719 ms  0.745 ms
 3  anutsi10.starhub.net.sg (203.118.3.226)  2.382 ms  2.371 ms  2.359 ms
 4  paix.he.net (198.32.176.20)  180.718 ms  180.727 ms  180.715 ms
 5  10gigabitethernet1-2.core1.fmt1.he.net (66.160.158.241)  190.110 ms  195.417 ms  190.356 ms
 6  linode-llc.10gigabitethernet2-3.core1.fmt1.he.net (64.62.250.6)  181.292 ms  181.263 ms  181.320 ms
 7  fremont1.linode.com (64.71.152.17)  186.094 ms  186.090 ms  186.079 ms
Top
   
Reply with quote  
TheClient
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 4:19 am 
Offline
Junior Member

Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 4:22 am
Posts: 42
Thanks, it shows that Tokyo will be faster for Singapore.
Top
   
Reply with quote  
mnordhoff
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 5:13 am 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 4:01 pm
Posts: 569
Website: http://www.mattnordhoff.com/
TheClient wrote:
Thanks, it shows that Tokyo will be faster for Singapore.

Sure, for that one Singapore ISP.

_________________
Matt Nordhoff (aka Peng on IRC)
Top
   
Reply with quote  
TheClient
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 9:21 am 
Offline
Junior Member

Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 4:22 am
Posts: 42
Just migrated my website to Tokyo DC from Fremont DC and tried from my 3G Starhub provider in Singapore to ping:

Reply from [hidden]: bytes=32 time=177ms TTL=56
Reply from [hidden]: bytes=32 time=176ms TTL=56
Reply from [hidden]: bytes=32 time=173ms TTL=56

Very good, I see around +50% performance increase compare to Fremont DC which I used before.

Also my home internet connection is quite slow, so I believe those guys with broadband will have better results.
Top
   
Reply with quote  
taligent
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 9:26 pm 
Offline
Senior Newbie

Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 12:58 am
Posts: 10
Around 20-30% improvement from Melbourne, Australia both on Telstra and TPG networks.

Plus it's not Fremont !!
Top
   
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic

Board index » Linux Community Forums » General Discussion


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
RSS

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group