vonskippy wrote:
ohkus wrote:
Wait so you are referencing an article that uses sources from 2003
Huh?
The paper was written for FAST '13 (the File and Storage Technologies Conference held in FEB 2013).
From what ass did you pull the 2003 figure?
The paper was done by postdoc's at OSU (Ohio State University) and by researchers at HP Labs.
They used 15 MODERN SSD drives from 5 MODERN vendors.
Geesh, the Infoworld article linked to all the technical papers - how hard was it to click on a few links and get your facts straight.
However, while we have over 50 years of collected wisdom working with spinning disk, flash-based SSDs are relatively new [1]
[1] Roberto Bez, Emilio Camerlenghi, Alberto Mod- elli, and Angelo Visconti. Introduction to Flash Memory. In Procedings of the IEEE, pages 489– 502, April 2003.
Go look at the sources the article uses....
You're showing your ignorance of how a technical paper is written, not poking holes in the paper itself. They're referencing a 10 year old paper to show that "flash-based SSD's are relatively new".