Some good points made by all.
jay wrote:
... I already have debian on my server.
So did I 1999-2003, but after some time in NetBSD-land, I now prefer my Linux to be served by Gentoo.
sednet wrote:
... compile your packages yourself with exactly the USE flags you want ...
I do that already -- package them locally, upload them to my Linode, then emerge -ukg them. It works, but is very time-consuming and is especially irritating for unscheduled maintenance like security updates.
pclissold wrote:
GenUX is in closed alpha at the moment - perhaps a little early to be asking caker about implementing it.
They are accepting contact at the moment with a BETA rollout anticipated in a few weeks.
pclissold wrote:
The service is priced at $10 per computer per month (presumably tied to IP addresses), so caker would have to cut some kind of deal for joint usage by Linodes.
My original post was not too clear, but yes, that's the idea. My $2-$3 per opt-in Gentoo Linode is well below the $10 indicated at the GenUX site, but I think reasonable considering that no Linoder is likely to be emerging x11, gnome or other huge meta-packages.
As for Chris, he already buys in services "on our behalf" from HE and TP. He also does some administering of licenses for a commercial webadmin front-end. A GenUX setup would be no different.
I assumed, as you did, that access control of GenUX services will be IP-based. If this is indeed the case, then Chris's administration costs would be minimal or, if script-based, even zero. GenUX would then just be an opt-in Linode Extra and paid as part of our monthly fee.
Among Gentoo users at large, there is some demand for binary packaging -- not all circumstances are right for source builds. The reason for the top post was to determine whether or not there is a significant level of demand for such an
Extra here.
If not, it's not a problem -- even though I think it would be a great feature to have.
Regards,
Cliff