Linode Forum
Linode Community Forums
 FAQFAQ    SearchSearch    MembersMembers      Register Register 
 LoginLogin [ Anonymous ] 
Post new topic  Reply to topic
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 12:20 am 
Offline
Junior Member

Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 2:40 am
Posts: 43
caker wrote:
IPv6 will happen at Linode very soon. Stay tuned.

-Chris


Yaaaaay! =)


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 4:53 am 
Offline
Senior Newbie

Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 3:47 am
Posts: 12
caker wrote:
I don't want Linode to be part of the adoption problem (what comes first - IPv6 servers or IPv6 clients?) and as such IPv6 support for Linodes is imminent.

IPv6 will happen at Linode very soon. Stay tuned.

It has been a month since this announcement, so can you give us any updates? Has there been any progress you can mention? I don't mean to sound impatient, I'm just excited about (soon) having native IPv6 support on my Linodes! This thread (with nearly 37,000 views and more than 100 posts) shows that a lot of us are.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 9:00 am 
Offline
Senior Newbie

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 11:24 pm
Posts: 5
NetRange: 2600:3C00:: - 2600:3C03:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF
CIDR: 2600:3C00::/30
OriginAS:
NetName: LINODE-US
NetHandle: NET6-2600-3C00-1
Parent: NET6-2600-1
NetType: Direct Allocation
NameServer: NS4.LINODE.COM
NameServer: NS1.LINODE.COM
NameServer: NS2.LINODE.COM
NameServer: NS5.LINODE.COM
NameServer: NS3.LINODE.COM
RegDate: 2011-02-07
Updated: 2011-02-07
Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET6-2600-3C00-1

OrgName: Linode
OrgId: LINOD
Address: 329 E. Jimmie Leeds Road
Address: Suite A
City: Galloway
StateProv: NJ
PostalCode: 08205
Country: US
RegDate: 2008-04-24
Updated: 2010-08-31
Comment: http://www.linode.com
Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/org/LINOD

OrgNOCHandle: LNO21-ARIN
OrgNOCName: Linode Network Operations
OrgNOCPhone: +1-609-593-7103
OrgNOCEmail: support@linode.com
OrgNOCRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/LNO21-ARIN

OrgAbuseHandle: LAS12-ARIN
OrgAbuseName: Linode Abuse Support
OrgAbusePhone: +1-609-593-7103
OrgAbuseEmail: abuse@linode.com
OrgAbuseRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/LAS12-ARIN

OrgTechHandle: LNO21-ARIN
OrgTechName: Linode Network Operations
OrgTechPhone: +1-609-593-7103
OrgTechEmail: support@linode.com
OrgTechRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/LNO21-ARIN

RTechHandle: LNO21-ARIN
RTechName: Linode Network Operations
RTechPhone: +1-609-593-7103
RTechEmail: support@linode.com
RTechRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/LNO21-ARIN

RAbuseHandle: LAS12-ARIN
RAbuseName: Linode Abuse Support
RAbusePhone: +1-609-593-7103
RAbuseEmail: abuse@linode.com
RAbuseRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/LAS12-ARIN

RNOCHandle: LNO21-ARIN
RNOCName: Linode Network Operations
RNOCPhone: +1-609-593-7103
RNOCEmail: support@linode.com
RNOCRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/LNO21-ARIN


For reference, Linode's snail address is:
Linode, LLC
329 E. Jimmie Leeds Road
Suite A
Galloway, NJ 08205


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 10:28 am 
Offline
Linode Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 6:24 pm
Posts: 3090
Website: http://www.linode.com/
Location: Galloway, NJ
There has been progress. We typically don't announce ETAs for stuff, but it is coming.

-Chris


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Mar 08, 2011 9:06 am 
Offline
Senior Newbie

Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:30 am
Posts: 16
jricher wrote:
Look what the AS6939 dragged in...


Also noticed this..

Code:
inet6num:       2a01:7e00::/32
netname:        EU-LINODE-201100201
descr:          Linode, LLC
country:        GB
org:            ORG-LL72-RIPE
admin-c:        TA2589-RIPE
tech-c:         TA2589-RIPE
status:         ALLOCATED-BY-RIR
mnt-by:         RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT
mnt-lower:      Linode-mnt
mnt-routes:     Linode-mnt
notify:         tasaro@linode.com
changed:        hostmaster@ripe.net 20110201
source:         RIPE

organisation:   ORG-LL72-RIPE
org-name:       Linode, LLC
org-type:       LIR
phone:          +16095937103
fax-no:         +16152504945
e-mail:         support@linode.com
abuse-mailbox:  abuse@linode.com
admin-c:        TA2589-RIPE
mnt-ref:        RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT
mnt-ref:        Linode-mnt
mnt-by:         RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT
changed:        hostmaster@ripe.net 20091102
changed:        bitbucket@ripe.net 20091106
changed:        bitbucket@ripe.net 20091110
changed:        bitbucket@ripe.net 20091110
changed:        bitbucket@ripe.net 20110128
source:         RIPE
address:        Linode, LLC
address:        Thomas Asaro
address:        329 E. Jimmie Leeds Road
address:        Suite A
address:        08205 Galloway
address:        UNITED STATES

person:         Thomas Asaro
address:        329 E. Jimmie Leeds Road, Suite A, Galloway, NJ 08205, USA
phone:          +16095937103
nic-hdl:        TA2589-RIPE
mnt-by:         Linode-mnt
changed:        tasaro@linode.com 20101119
source:         RIPE


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 2:00 am 
Offline
Senior Newbie

Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 3:47 am
Posts: 12
caker wrote:
However, I don't want Linode to be part of the adoption problem (what comes first - IPv6 servers or IPv6 clients?) and as such IPv6 support for Linodes is imminent.

IPv6 will happen at Linode very soon. Stay tuned.

We've been anxiously tuned for more than two months now, so can you give us any updates? I don't mean to sound impatient, but my organization wants to participate in World IPv6 Day on June 8 and we're hoping to do so with our Linodes! Maybe you can tell us whether Linode is expected to offer native IPv6 (in at least one datacenter) by then, or if we should start making contingency plans now? Thanks!


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 10:12 am 
Offline
Linode Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 6:24 pm
Posts: 3090
Website: http://www.linode.com/
Location: Galloway, NJ
My response is the same as it was 4 weeks ago: We are actively working on IPv6. Beyond that, I can not comment on its arrival.

-Chris


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 7:37 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 6:54 pm
Posts: 833
titan wrote:
I don't mean to sound impatient, but my organization wants to participate in World IPv6 Day on June 8 and we're hoping to do so with our Linodes! Maybe you can tell us whether Linode is expected to offer native IPv6 (in at least one datacenter) by then, or if we should start making contingency plans now? Thanks!

Why don't you set up a HE tunnel now and prove out your solution. If native IPv6 occurs in time then you have the choice of switching your DNS and config to that or stick with the HE tunnel (if timelines are tight).

Doing this now will verify that such a solution is viable (at least for Jun 8th) or allow you to work on an alternate plan if it's not.

_________________
Rgds
Stephen
(Linux user since kernel version 0.11)


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 3:20 am 
Offline
Senior Newbie

Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 3:47 am
Posts: 12
sweh wrote:
Why don't you set up a HE tunnel now and prove out your solution. If native IPv6 occurs in time then you have the choice of switching your DNS and config to that or stick with the HE tunnel (if timelines are tight).

Hi Sweh. We have been using HE tunnels for years, but not for our production services. The HE tunnel broker is a wonderful free offering, but I don't think it is appropriate nor intended for high traffic production services. HE says it is "oriented towards developers and experimenters". HE also offers "business class commercial native IPv6 service" in the Fremont datacenter where all my org's Linodes are hosted, but since we aren't HE's direct customer, it is Linode corp that has to do some setup for this to work.

Caker said that native IPv6 support was "imminent" a couple months ago, and today he confirmed that they are still "actively working on IPv6". So I'm still holding out hope that they'll implement it in time for World IPv6 day. It is a shame that they won't provide any ETA or transparency about where they are in the process, but I can understand their reasoning. At least the IPv6 allocations discovered by sleuths on this forum are encouraging!


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 08, 2011 5:58 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 12:44 am
Posts: 92
OverlordQ wrote:
Ahead of the curve? IPv6 has been in most O/S's for over a decade. Continuing to adopt a 'wait-and-see' attitude is *waaaaaaay behind* the curve.

Most ISPs have no IPv6 and will not have it for many years. Which makes the whole exercise completely academic. A lot of people here use linodes for testing and fooling around, so IPv6 at linode actually makes some sense. But I agree with caker that it will be many years before IPv6 would become useful for people running production servers.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 08, 2011 8:48 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 7:47 pm
Posts: 1970
Website: http://www.rwky.net
Location: Earth
...I don't think my modem is even IPv6 capable it's oldddddd.

_________________
Paid support
How to ask for help
1. Give details of your problem
2. Post any errors
3. Post relevant logs.
4. Don't hide details i.e. your domain, it just makes things harder
5. Be polite or you'll be eaten by a grue


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 8:03 am 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:09 am
Posts: 4
Website: http://www.morsing.cc/
Consumer modems still doesn't do IPv6 themselves but that doesn't stop you running it in pass-through mode and using ppp on your computer to connect. That's how most people do it.

_________________
Why can I not enter my IRC info in the forum profile?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 11:26 am 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 12:49 am
Posts: 333
neo wrote:
But I agree with caker that it will be many years before IPv6 would become useful for people running production servers.


Unless you live in asia, where they're starting in on their last /8 and that means each company can only get a single /22. So that pretty much means it's going to be useful for them PDQ.


Top
   
 Post subject: Native IPv6 a must
PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2011 12:55 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 4:11 pm
Posts: 554
Website: http://www.unixtastic.com
Location: Europe
Given that all the RIR's will be on their last /8 before the end of this year native IPv6 is a must. Tunnels give twice the routing problems, additional delays, additional unpredictability, and reduced MTU.

Everyone has dragged their feet on this far too long, there is no way of avoiding IPv6 any longer.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Native IPv6 a must
PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2011 6:25 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 6:54 pm
Posts: 833
sednet wrote:
Given that all the RIR's will be on their last /8 before the end of this year native IPv6 is a must.

Conclusion doesn't follow from premis.
Quote:
Tunnels give twice the routing problems, additional delays, additional unpredictability, and reduced MTU.


Funnily enough, I have lower latency between my home (New York) and my Linode (fremont) when using ip6 via HE tunnels

ip4:
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 95.170/97.108/97.899/1.193 ms

ip6:
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 79.150/81.967/84.056/2.033 ms, pipe 2

_________________
Rgds

Stephen

(Linux user since kernel version 0.11)


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: mwchase and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
RSS

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group