Linode Forum
Linode Community Forums
 FAQFAQ    SearchSearch    MembersMembers      Register Register 
 LoginLogin [ Anonymous ] 
Post new topic  Reply to topic
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Mar 02, 2009 9:06 am 
Offline
Senior Newbie

Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 6:35 pm
Posts: 11
I know I for one would choose the
"120MB RAM for $12/month" option if it existed.
Or, even more extreme, "60 MB RAM for $8/month" :)
Thanks!
-=r


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 02, 2009 10:07 am 
Offline
Linode Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 6:24 pm
Posts: 3090
Website: http://www.linode.com/
Location: Galloway, NJ
Hello,

We're not going to go below the $20/mo (ok, $19.95) price point, sorry.

Thanks for your input,
-Chris


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 6:06 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 8:44 pm
Posts: 1121
It's a good idea, though. you can do quite a lot of work with 120MB of RAM.

What about $19.95 per 2 months or something like that? :)

Having said that, ~120 linodes per host would seem a bit extreme....


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 6:12 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 2:10 am
Posts: 103
The problem is low RAM + more linodes = more IO load... That's not something that can be fixed by changing the billing cycle :)


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 8:39 am 
Offline
Senior Newbie

Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 6:35 pm
Posts: 11
bdonlan wrote:
The problem is low RAM + more linodes = more IO load... That's not something that can be fixed by changing the billing cycle :)


That's too bad since it still makes shared hosting seem tempting :)

I hope they can get more disks or faster sometime and make this possible. Or that xen comes up with a better IO scheduler that punishes those who overuse the disk :)


-=r


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 9:15 pm 
Offline
Junior Member

Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 9:49 pm
Posts: 34
I don't think shared hosting is really competition. When you get a VPS, you are probably aware that you need one, or have a specific requirement for one. Cheers!


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 9:29 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 7:49 pm
Posts: 96
Website: http://www.arbitraryconstant.com/
rogerdpack wrote:
That's too bad since it still makes shared hosting seem tempting :)
If you're doing something that can be accomplished with shared hosting, that's always going to be a cheaper way of doing it.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 10:16 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 8:44 pm
Posts: 1121
atourino wrote:
I don't think shared hosting is really competition. When you get a VPS, you are probably aware that you need one, or have a specific requirement for one. Cheers!

Alas, there are too many people out there who are looking to get a VPS simply because they think it'll give them a magical performance boost at the cost of a lunch, or because they got dugg and kicked out by their draconian shared host.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 10:20 pm 
Offline
Junior Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 10:45 pm
Posts: 38
hybinet wrote:
Alas, there are too many people out there who are looking to get a VPS simply because they think it'll give them a magical performance boost at the cost of a lunch, or because they got dugg and kicked out by their draconian shared host.

Well it is a pretty nice performance boost!

But a VPS is also a lot of work. If a person isn't willing to put forth the effort to learn, maintain, optimize, and monitor a system then they should probably go with shared hosting.

I like having a VPS because that just makes the whole hobby of running a fansite that much more fun. But I'm masochistic that way.

.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 09, 2009 12:33 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 4:30 pm
Posts: 341
Website: http://markwalling.org
Lykaon wrote:
Well it is a pretty nice performance boost!


When you don't have 80 Linode180s fighting for the same resources... (which is the original point of the thread)


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 09, 2009 1:27 am 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 1:43 am
Posts: 67
Website: http://fukawi2.nl
Location: Melbourne, Australia
I was thinking about this the other day -- a "Minode" for firewalling etc in front of another (360/540/720 etc) Linode :D

But if Linode have decided they're not going to go there, then I can push that idea out 8)


Top
   
 Post subject: "minode" add-on
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 1:13 pm 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 1:50 pm
Posts: 2
Perhaps they can offer "mini" linodes as as an addon to existing "full" linodes. I'd be interested in a $12/mo 120MB / 5GB linode to compliment my other linodes. I'd personally use it for dns, and to run nagios, some admin web apps and other scripts on. it would be nice to move those tasks off the main web servers.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 1:50 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 3:19 am
Posts: 336
You'd still run into the same issue of too many Linodes on a server. This is one of the reasons I'm here, because Linodes does NOT over sell their servers. Linode is part of a very small set of hosts who do not oversell their servers.

If Linode started doing this, I'd move. The last thing and last place I want to be is a bargain basement host selling to the "$4.95/month unlimited" crowd. Nothing but trouble comes from that. You make VPS that cheap and you'll have nothing but problems.

If you need cheap VPS http://www.vaserv.com/ oh wait, they're dead in the water.... :)

Just had to put my .02 in the bucket.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 5:57 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 1:26 pm
Posts: 171
Website: http://www.rejecttheherd.net
Location: Seattle
waldo wrote:
You'd still run into the same issue of too many Linodes on a server. This is one of the reasons I'm here, because Linodes does NOT over sell their servers. Linode is part of a very small set of hosts who do not oversell their servers.

If Linode started doing this, I'd move. The last thing and last place I want to be is a bargain basement host selling to the "$4.95/month unlimited" crowd. Nothing but trouble comes from that. You make VPS that cheap and you'll have nothing but problems.

If you need cheap VPS http://www.vaserv.com/ oh wait, they're dead in the water.... :)

Just had to put my .02 in the bucket.


You pretty much nailed it Image

There's already a market niche for < $20 a month crowd and it's rather full Image

_________________
Image
Where "Thought Crime" is commited
http://www.rejecttheherd.net


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: "minode" add-on
PostPosted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 12:26 am 
Offline
Senior Newbie

Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 10:33 am
Posts: 17
web4biz wrote:
Perhaps they can offer "mini" linodes as as an addon to existing "full" linodes. I'd be interested in a $12/mo 120MB / 5GB linode to compliment my other linodes. I'd personally use it for dns, and to run nagios, some admin web apps and other scripts on. it would be nice to move those tasks off the main web servers.


Sounds like a nice addon, say those with greater than 1-2 Linodes have the option of getting a baby one for as long as they keep the bigger ones, otherwise the price reverts to something ridiculous.

In the business scheme of things, a $20 Linode in your monthly costs shouldn't really be breaking the bank :-)

I can understand Linode's point of view wanting to have a minimum revenue per customer/month.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
RSS

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group