Linode Forum
Linode Community Forums
 FAQFAQ    SearchSearch    MembersMembers      Register Register 
 LoginLogin [ Anonymous ] 
Post new topic  Reply to topic
Author Message
 Post subject: MTU
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:54 am 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 1:32 pm
Posts: 222
Website: https://www.barkerjr.net
Location: Connecticut, USA
Can we increase our MTU? This would decrease the CPU load.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 11:41 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 1:55 pm
Posts: 1739
Location: Rochester, New York
[citation needed]


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 8:19 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 1:32 pm
Posts: 222
Website: https://www.barkerjr.net
Location: Connecticut, USA
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maximum_transmission_unit


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 01, 2010 10:18 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 1691
Location: Montreal, QC
BarkerJr wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maximum_transmission_unit


What HoopyCat means, I think, is that you should back up your claim that increasing the MTU would decrease CPU load. The CPU savings from doing this are probably so small as to be unmeasurable.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 01, 2010 1:00 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 1:32 pm
Posts: 222
Website: https://www.barkerjr.net
Location: Connecticut, USA
Wikipedia says so in the second paragraph.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 01, 2010 1:28 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 1:59 pm
Posts: 362
BarkerJr wrote:
Wikipedia says so in the second paragraph.

*login edit edit commit*
Now it says that increasing MTU will summon flying pink unicorns.
Okay, not really, but... don't trust Wikipedia.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:44 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 1691
Location: Montreal, QC
Sure, if you're routing millions of packets per second, or are running on an embedded device with limited performance, then it might make a difference. On what is effectively a quad xeon server, any difference would be below the margin of error.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 7:45 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2012 9:01 pm
Posts: 52
The only real reliable way is to use an increased MTU (without unicorns) is over the internal network. This I suspect would give benefit for for database connections, proxies, drbd, load balancers.

Nodebalancer to backend seems like a place where jumbo frames could be used if the Nodebalancer assembles TCP packets from/to web clients gives the backend less to assemble. Only way to see what impact is by testing.

Some small stats/recommendations I could find were;

* An Oracle test Seems to indicate a throughput increase of %4. I'd assume other DB based protocols would suffer the same bottlenecks.
* DRBD documentation suggests a performance increase under a number of likely deployment scenarios.
* MySQL cluster


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
RSS

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group