reaktor wrote:
I'm not looking for insults or advice from the peanut gallery on how to run my own linode, but rather making a feature request to Linode staff.
Right, but it's perfectly legitimate for us to question the utility of such a feature. What value is there in a web interface to manage a host-side firewall? There is no performance advantage there, since the filtering will still be happening on the same hardware. There's no usability advantage there, since you can do the web interface directly on the linode just as easily.
DNS makes sense; you can't get the high availability from your one linode as you can from Linode's cluster of them, for one thing. But a firewall on the host doesn't have that same advantage.
You're asking Linode to spend time and effort in a feature that I suspect most of the Linode community thinks is useless. Just as much as you should have the opportunity to request a feature be implemented, we should have the opportunity to request that a feature *not* be implemented.