Linode Forum
Linode Community Forums
 FAQFAQ    SearchSearch    MembersMembers      Register Register 
 LoginLogin [ Anonymous ] 
Forum locked  This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2003 8:46 pm 
Online
Linode Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 6:24 pm
Posts: 3090
Website: http://www.linode.com/
Location: Galloway, NJ
This new kernel contains only the new UML patch, and uses the same .config from the previous kernel.

Changelog is here.

"Latest 2.4" now points to this kernel. If you have "Latest 2.4 Series" selected for your kernel in your configuration profile (which is the default), your Linode will use this kernel next time you reboot. "uname -a" will tell you which version you are currently running under.

Thanks!
-Chris


Last edited by caker on Mon Dec 01, 2003 11:57 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2003 9:22 pm 
Offline
Junior Member

Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 7:24 pm
Posts: 42
Website: http://opencurve.org/~sunny
Location: New York, NY
WOO!!!

the /dev/kmem bug is fixed !!

UPGRADE NOW!!!

Sunny Dubey


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2003 12:03 am 
Offline
Junior Member

Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 7:24 pm
Posts: 42
Website: http://opencurve.org/~sunny
Location: New York, NY
Just tested it .... and it works!!

once again ...

UPGRADE NOW!!!!


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2003 12:25 am 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 12:57 am
Posts: 273
sunny wrote:
WOO!!!

the /dev/kmem bug is fixed !!

UPGRADE NOW!!!

Sunny Dubey


How exactly does this /dev/kmem bug manifest itself?

I haven't had any problems with my Linode, about a month and a half of uptime, is there any reason that I should upgrade the kernel? I'm think that with everything working well, the only reason would be a security problem. Does this patch fix any security problems? *Are* there any known security problems with UML?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2003 1:16 am 
Online
Linode Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 6:24 pm
Posts: 3090
Website: http://www.linode.com/
Location: Galloway, NJ
The bug is the result of the Linux kmem driver expecting the range of usable memory to start at address 0, but to this isn't the case within UML. In this latest UML patch, Jeff Dike included a fix to the kmem driver (which I'm assuming is not UML specific) to handle UML's special case.

I don't know the exact point when this bug was introduced, I believe it was somewhere during 2.4.21's UML patches.

If a program tried to open /dev/kmem it would result in a kernel panic (termination). Example ways to crash and burn are "strings /dev/kmem" or "less -f /dev/kmem".

It's worth a reboot.

-Chris


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2003 3:00 pm 
Online
Linode Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 6:24 pm
Posts: 3090
Website: http://www.linode.com/
Location: Galloway, NJ
I just updated this kernel to fix the bogus reboot on shutdown.

-Chris


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2003 4:39 pm 
Offline
Junior Member

Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2003 1:44 pm
Posts: 46
Website: http://www.officemechanic.com
AOL: schof@mac.com
Location: Los Angeles
caker wrote:
I just updated this kernel to fix the bogus reboot on shutdown.

-Chris


What problem does this refer to? I just tested, and a reboot given on the command-line still does a shutdown. Were you talking about a different problem?

_________________
John Schofield
Apple Certified Technical Coordinator
Office Mechanic Consulting
Mac, Unix, and PC Computer Support
www.officemechanic.com


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2003 4:49 pm 
Online
Linode Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 6:24 pm
Posts: 3090
Website: http://www.linode.com/
Location: Galloway, NJ
I initially released the kernel without making the "reboot actually performs a poweroff" patch. So, issuing a reboot from your Linode ACTUALLY rebooted.

Even worse, issuing a reboot from the LPM would put in a shutdown job, which issues CAD (control-alt-delete) which your /etc/inittab is set to reboot, and so it would reboot back online while the shutdown job would timeout and perform a sync;sync;halt, and finally a kill. Does that make any sense?

Reboot seems to be the theme of the day :)

-Chris


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked  This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
RSS

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group