Linode Forum
Linode Community Forums
 FAQFAQ    SearchSearch    MembersMembers      Register Register 
 LoginLogin [ Anonymous ] 
Post new topic  Reply to topic
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 5:18 am 
Offline
Junior Member

Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 48
Hello,

I've got two Linodes 720, which I really think are too "big" for me. One hosts a bunch of LAMP websites, mostly quite-inactive blogs, and serves a secondary MX server. The other runs a Postfix mail service (spamassassin, clamav...), which won't be very busy if the SPAM rate wouldn't be so high; it additionally runs a Horde instance, and that's it.

So, I think that maybe Linode 720 is too much for my needs. The question is, how can I know which size would be perfect? What parameters should I look for?

Thanks in advance


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 3:00 pm 
Offline
Junior Member

Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 8:24 pm
Posts: 22
Website: http://www.iheartlinux.com
Location: Pennsylvania
which distro are you using.......


If ubuntu run:


apt-get update
apt-get install htop

then run:

htop

see how much memory your using.......if it is minimal then do a downgrade......my postfix, clam squirellmail runs around 208MB.....






also a good way to stop spam before your clam gets to it is to add the following to your /etc/postfix/main.cf


unknown_address_reject_code = 554
unknown_hostname_reject_code = 554
unknown_client_reject_code = 554

This reduces spam that has to get filtered.......a little.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 10:03 am 
Offline
Junior Member

Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 48
Ooops, sorry. One is gentoo, the other is ubuntu.

Thanks for the tip of htop, didn't know about it.

htop in gentoo (the first, typical LAMP server) right now says:

Load: 0.53 0.57 0.27
Mem: 137/701 Mb
Swap: 30/1023 Mb

htop in ubuntu (the second, mail server) right now says:

Load: 0.72 0.43 0.26
Mem: 489/720 Mb
Swp: 17/255 Mb

I guess the first one is a little oversized.


Top
   
 Post subject: Agreed:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 10:09 am 
Offline
Junior Member

Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 8:24 pm
Posts: 22
Website: http://www.iheartlinux.com
Location: Pennsylvania
I agree, the first one has plenty of room (overshot). Unless you plan on taking a load of hits, I would either consolidate and upgrade to the busier linode, or maybe consider a downgrade on the first one.



:arrow: I think either will provide a cost savings.

_________________
Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 10:27 am 
Offline
Junior Member

Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 48
I don't plan to be slashdotted in the near future :)

Anyway, I won't consolidate them, because I really want to have a secondary MX. It wouldn't be the first time I crash my servers during an upgrade... :oops:

So I'll downgrade it, after asking tech support how to proceed with minimal impact. And in the future, when I get some spare time, I might consolidate this LAMP server with my brand new, Kolab server, which is right now yawning...

P.S.: What a good idea this Kolab thing is!


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 3:27 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2003 2:28 pm
Posts: 245
ferfer wrote:
Anyway, I won't consolidate them, because I really want to have a secondary MX. It wouldn't be the first time I crash my servers during an upgrade... :oops:


Entirely your choice, of course, but worth pointing out that just being down a day shouldn't lose any mail - it should just queue, usually for three or four days before being rejected. OTOH, you won't *see* that mail until your server is back up, which may be your point.

_________________
The irony is that Bill Gates claims to be making a stable operating system and Linus Torvalds claims to be trying to take over the world.
-- seen on the net


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 5:43 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:21 am
Posts: 59
SteveG wrote:
Entirely your choice, of course, but worth pointing out that just being down a day shouldn't lose any mail - it should just queue, usually for three or four days before being rejected. OTOH, you won't *see* that mail until your server is back up, which may be your point.


Not really true. Spam engines tend not to queue emails and hence he might miss a lot of spam! :P


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 5:05 am 
Offline
Junior Member

Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 48
weave wrote:
Not really true. Spam engines tend not to queue emails and hence he might miss a lot of spam! :P


That's true, and installing postgrey was a big relief; however, it delays ham delivery, sometimes even for 24 hours, and I cannot afford this delay, so I uninstalled it.

Thanks for the tips!


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
RSS

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group