Linode Forum
Linode Community Forums
 FAQFAQ    SearchSearch    MembersMembers      Register Register 
 LoginLogin [ Anonymous ] 
Post new topic  Reply to topic
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Nov 20, 2003 12:44 pm 
Offline
Senior Newbie

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 2:58 pm
Posts: 19
So my 192Meg RAM Linode on Host6 took six hours to compile glibc
while doing basically nothing else.

Since this is my first experience with Linux, Gento and compiling GNU
software (but not compiling in general), does this mean:

1. Linodes are disk bound, as I've heard.
2. Compiling is a disk-intensive activity.
3. Host6 was pretty busy Wednesday.
4. Gentoo is not the best choice for a Linode.
5. 192Megs RAM is too little for compiling.
6. I should stop updating my software so frequently.
7. Something's wrong somewhere.
8. All of the above.

I missed saving an SSH session observing the later stages but
I can say that my load average was above 2, top reported most
kernel processes in SW state, and I still had 3-13 Megs free RAM,
per top and free.

The build finished fine. I know I've built this more than once since
getting my Linode and I know it never took this long.

I'd appreciate any and all comments. I'm here to learn.

Thanks,
Wes


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Nov 26, 2003 5:00 am 
Offline
Senior Newbie

Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 5:33 pm
Posts: 17
alphonso wrote:
So my 192Meg RAM Linode on Host6 took six hours to compile glibc
while doing basically nothing else.

Since this is my first experience with Linux, Gento and compiling GNU
software (but not compiling in general), does this mean:

1. Linodes are disk bound, as I've heard.
2. Compiling is a disk-intensive activity.
3. Host6 was pretty busy Wednesday.
4. Gentoo is not the best choice for a Linode.
5. 192Megs RAM is too little for compiling.
6. I should stop updating my software so frequently.
7. Something's wrong somewhere.
8. All of the above.

I missed saving an SSH session observing the later stages but
I can say that my load average was above 2, top reported most
kernel processes in SW state, and I still had 3-13 Megs free RAM,
per top and free.

The build finished fine. I know I've built this more than once since
getting my Linode and I know it never took this long.

I'd appreciate any and all comments. I'm here to learn.

Thanks,
Wes


oh. so yer the one futzing up host6! (joking)... six hours isn't unexpected. glibc is a large beast.

-e


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 26, 2003 1:22 pm 
Offline
Senior Newbie

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 2:58 pm
Posts: 19
Quote:
efudd wrote:
oh. so yer the one futzing up host6! (joking)... six hours isn't unexpected. glibc is a large beast.


Am NOT! :)

Thanks for the comment -- I don't have any baseline for this stuff
since I've got no desktop box experience to compare it with. Anyway,
I rebooted to the latest kernel and the occasional compile seems
snappier now.

Host6 is showing signs of use though, like pauses in SSH sessions
and sluggishness parsing man pages, but I ain't doing it.

Except for my once-a-week-or-so compile of Gentoo stuff, it's at load 0.
Apache's using something like 7-thousandths of the CPU!


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 26, 2003 6:36 pm 
Offline
Senior Newbie

Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 5:33 pm
Posts: 17
alphonso wrote:
Quote:
efudd wrote:
oh. so yer the one futzing up host6! (joking)... six hours isn't unexpected. glibc is a large beast.


Am NOT! :)

Thanks for the comment -- I don't have any baseline for this stuff
since I've got no desktop box experience to compare it with. Anyway,
I rebooted to the latest kernel and the occasional compile seems
snappier now.

Host6 is showing signs of use though, like pauses in SSH sessions
and sluggishness parsing man pages, but I ain't doing it.

Except for my once-a-week-or-so compile of Gentoo stuff, it's at load 0.
Apache's using something like 7-thousandths of the CPU!


lol.... host6 is basically ok for me except for one known issue to-be-resolved-on-the-next-host6-reboot relating to networking. Everything else seems decently snappy for a smallish system. I can't complain too much.

My personal machines are, at minimum, 2.8Ghz processors tho... so I don't expect a lot of overall performance from the UML.

-e


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 26, 2003 9:56 pm 
Offline
Senior Newbie

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 2:58 pm
Posts: 19
Some of us have low expectations, period -- I'm posting this from an iMac with a whizzy 400MHz PPC (not mine : ) ).

I can get a cup of coffee before some menus drop...

I've got no real complaints about my Linode. I think about it very fondly and probably would have given it a cute hostname if I didn't think it'd haunt me someday in tough-guy sysadmin circles.

Imagine Chris reading the request to reverse-DNS my host to "fluffball".


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 27, 2003 2:18 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2003 4:49 pm
Posts: 62
Location: Bucharest
mine is named dorothy


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
RSS

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group