hybinet wrote:
Honestly though, fsckvps was pretty good for $9.95/mo, at least when compared to other sub-$10 providers (of which there are more than a handful).
Quite correct. Really, to be honest, fsck was great until the HyperVM attack.

HyperVM itself was inferior to Linode's control panel- but really, I didn't have to mess with it very much.
Quote:
The question is: Do you want $9.95 worth of service, or do you want $19.95 worth of service?
I have learned my lesson, as I bet many others have too.
It took a good 6-7 hours work after 48 hours downtime to get everything online over here. I had backups but they were not recent (another lesson learned!-I guess if the worst happened I would have had something though). In the end I had to wait for them to get http online and hack (irony time) a script that I made to run the command through php to create a tar of my files and transfer here. Ssh (so sftp) is still offline, so I couldn't download files the normal way. This was on my server anyway, they are not really responding to tickets.
I feel for less technical fsck-ers & those who lost data.
Anyway, I'm glad to be live & back at linode
