Linode Forum
Linode Community Forums
 FAQFAQ    SearchSearch    MembersMembers      Register Register 
 LoginLogin [ Anonymous ] 
Post new topic  Reply to topic
Author Message
 Post subject: newark issue...
PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 12:54 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 1:32 pm
Posts: 737
Location: Italy
I haven't backuped my data... PANIC!!!


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 12:58 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 2:40 pm
Posts: 126
http://status.linode.com/2010/05/networ ... ewark.html


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 12:58 pm 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 5:22 pm
Posts: 3
Don't worry, its a network problem, I'm sure your data will be safe.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 1:15 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 1:32 pm
Posts: 737
Location: Italy
ianneub wrote:
Don't worry, its a network problem, I'm sure your data will be safe.


I'm losing money :°(


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 1:18 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 8:20 am
Posts: 81
I think it is time for linode to offer a dns failover between its datacenters.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 1:32 pm 
Offline
Senior Newbie

Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 4:33 pm
Posts: 5
Will there be something done in the future to prevent this? So if one upstream provider is having a problem people will still be able to connect while the problem is being resolved.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 1:53 pm 
Offline
Junior Member

Joined: Sat May 05, 2007 8:53 pm
Posts: 49
Do you guys have any idea what's going on?

It's pretty unusual for a data center to have connectivity problems that take this long to sort out.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 1:53 pm 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 1:37 pm
Posts: 2
jcr wrote:
I think it is time for linode to offer a dns failover between its datacenters.


Yes please. I'm very keen to dual host in London/Newark, and hoping the backup system will make it easy for me to maintain synch.

"Keen", in this case, should be read as "ready to throw money at Linode".


Top
   
 Post subject: Newbie here...
PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 1:56 pm 
Offline
Junior Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 3:32 pm
Posts: 44
Website: http://devjonfos.net
Location: Oregon
I'm a new Linode customer, this Newark issue brought up a question:

    If I had more than one node and in different datacenters, but only one node active at a time (web server, for example), if the active node's datacenter went down, couldn't I bring up the alternate node and change the DNS records in the Linode DNS Manager to point to my alternate node? And then be back in business once the DNS changes propagate? Of course, this assumes that the alternate node keeps in sync with the active node.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 2:18 pm 
Offline
Senior Newbie

Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 4:33 pm
Posts: 5
The issue appears to be resolved now.


Top
   
 Post subject: More newbie ...
PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 2:24 pm 
Offline
Junior Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 3:32 pm
Posts: 44
Website: http://devjonfos.net
Location: Oregon
TheHeartSmasher wrote:
The issue appears to be resolved now.


So solved in about 2 hours...that seems reasonable.

Does Linode publish more information about the problem?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 3:02 pm 
Offline
Junior Member

Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 11:19 pm
Posts: 45
Yes this brings up a major concern over DNS failover. I would pay for additional nodes if I could get the DNS failover to operate between data centers.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 19, 2010 10:08 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 1:55 pm
Posts: 1739
Location: Rochester, New York
mattm wrote:
Yes this brings up a major concern over DNS failover. I would pay for additional nodes if I could get the DNS failover to operate between data centers.


It's there, and has been for some time.

http://www.linode.com/api/index.cfm?method=domain.resource.update

Set the TTL nice and low, and failover should take <20 minutes from when your systems detect a problem; if failover needs to happen more quickly, you'll probably need to set up your own master nameservers and push updates that way.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 19, 2010 10:34 am 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 1:37 pm
Posts: 2
hoopycat wrote:


Sure, in the same ways I could have run my own crons to do local backups. But I'd much rather pay to have it done for me. No admin, and somebody else to blame if it fails. What's not to like?

I don't even want to know my second box exists, never mind keeping it in synch. I just want it to automagically (and preferably immediately) pick up the load the next time Newark has network problems.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 19, 2010 12:17 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 1:55 pm
Posts: 1739
Location: Rochester, New York
That's getting well into the realm of a managed service, alas. There is no way to implement that as a service, without severely limiting the applications and configurations allowed. By that point, it's merely high-availability web hosting.

There are, of course, a myriad of contract sysadmins and developers who could make this work for your particular situation, but they aren't under the Extras tab :-)


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
RSS

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group