Linode Forum
Linode Community Forums
 FAQFAQ    SearchSearch    MembersMembers      Register Register 
 LoginLogin [ Anonymous ] 
Post new topic  Reply to topic
Author Message
 Post subject: File: /etc/hosts
PostPosted: Wed Oct 27, 2010 1:09 pm 
Hello,

I am a totaly newbie on linode and linux world.
I did creat an acount today at linode and I began with geting startet guide and get stoppet at the end.

My problem is that I don't know where to open files?:s
Here is my problem
You'll also want to make sure proper entries for your Linode's fully qualified domain name (FQDN) and localhost are set up in your /etc/hosts file. You can use the following example file, modifying the entries to suit your setup (12.34.56.78 should be replaced with your Linode's IP address):

File: /etc/hosts

127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost
12.34.56.78 plato.example.com plato

Can you please tell me where to open File: /etc/hosts?:S
I have downloaded Putty, is not that this for uploading files to the server and edit them instead of ftp like filezilla to upload content to your server?

I need a step by step guide, please.

Thank you for your time


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 27, 2010 5:11 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 1691
Location: Montreal, QC
The Linode library is an excellent resources for getting up and running. If you're completely unfamiliar with Linux, this section of the library might have some useful links:

http://library.linode.com/beginners-gui ... ux_basics_


Top
   
 Post subject: know
PostPosted: Wed Oct 27, 2010 5:27 pm 
Hello,

thanks for reply.

I did read it but that was not there.

Just wantet to find out how to edit files.
Finally with e.g
nano /etc/hosts.

It is going well now. learned much :)


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 11:14 am 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 11:07 am
Posts: 3
pico or vi is also helpful when editing.

_________________
<< snipped >>


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 7:35 am 
Offline
Junior Member

Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 11:52 pm
Posts: 36
ariel22 wrote:
pico or vi is also helpful when editing.


pico still lives?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 1:41 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 1:59 pm
Posts: 362
Talman wrote:
pico still lives?

Doubly so. You still can get the real (al)pine + pico package, and a lot of distros install nano (with pico aliased to it) as default.
I, personally, prefer ed.

_________________
rsk, providing useless advice on the Internet since 2005.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 10:25 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 1691
Location: Montreal, QC
I think he was probably more surprised that anybody still uses pico instead of nano. Most people switched because Pico is not free software, and nano has a lot more features.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 1:28 pm 
Offline
Junior Member

Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 11:52 pm
Posts: 36
Guspaz wrote:
I think he was probably more surprised that anybody still uses pico instead of nano. Most people switched because Pico is not free software, and nano has a lot more features.


I'm surprised that pico is still in repos, mainly because its not free software and there's a free software alternative out there (nano) that is installed by default in a lot of things.

I remember, years ago, when I used alpine and pico. Then I think it was Gentoo that was all "Do not use pico. Use nano." Granted, years ago, I was on an ISP that offered shell access via Solaris boxes, and PPP was experimental. :( I WAS THE FIRST OF MY FRIENDS TO GET SLIP!


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 10:42 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 5:32 pm
Posts: 634
Talman wrote:
I'm surprised that pico is still in repos, mainly because its not free software and there's a free software alternative out there (nano) that is installed by default in a lot of things.


I've never understood why UW insisted on the pseudo-free license they had for pine, or why they never went back and released it all when they changed and put alpine under a free license. To this day, if you want pine (I have a user who loves it) in debuntu, you get a source package that has the original source and a patch. It automagically downloads and patches for you, but it meets the requirement that it be distributed unmodified.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: sjnorton and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
RSS

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group