Linode Forum
Linode Community Forums
 FAQFAQ    SearchSearch    MembersMembers      Register Register 
 LoginLogin [ Anonymous ] 
Post new topic  Reply to topic
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:37 am 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 1:37 am
Posts: 385
Location: NC, USA
Their competition offered a backup service, so Linode needed to match that feature to stay competitive. Pretty simple business logic.

AFAIK the competition does not offer more disk space than linode, so...


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 12:26 am 
Offline
Senior Newbie
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:06 pm
Posts: 5
Website: http://www.aetlantis.com
Location: USA
Posted in the other thread, please refer to this link

Please delete this post!


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2011 7:35 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 9:41 am
Posts: 1
vonskippy wrote:
But they're also "losing" customers because they don't have Windows VPS, or because people want cPanel, or because people don't like Green Squares, etc.


This is linode, not winode.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2011 11:54 am 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 12:11 pm
Posts: 142
mizerydearia wrote:
vonskippy wrote:
But they're also "losing" customers because they don't have Windows VPS, or because people want cPanel, or because people don't like Green Squares, etc.


This is linode, not winode.


You necro'd this thread to say THAT?!


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2011 2:41 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 12:57 am
Posts: 273
Just for fun I did a very brief survey of what's available at softlayer's Dallas location (this is where Dallas Linodes are right?) to see what could be offered as a 'local' (to the datacenter, anyway) storage service.

I believe that their cheapest private network machine (which I interpret to mean that it can only serve to other systems in the data center?) is $119 per month and that it's an additional $180 per month for three 2 TB drives in it, for a total of about $300 per month.

As a very raw cost, this is $0.05 per gigabyte per month, but assumes:

- That all 6 TB of drive space is entirely dedicated to storage
- That there is no loss of storage space due to redundant RAID configurations that protect against drive failure

To fudge some numbers, how about only 1/2 of the drive space being available? Then the cost per gigabyte is $0.10 per month. Now maybe someone wants to make a profit off of the storage service, so double the cost again. Now it's $0.20 per month.

Perhaps some enterprising individual would like to start a company providing networked storage that is local to the data center to Linode customers? If customers are charged $0.50 per gigabyte per month, a profit of $0.25 per month per GB seems possible. On a 6 TB server that is $1500 per month profit.

I wonder how many Linode customers would be interested in $0.50 per month networked storage? And I wonder what kind of performance could be expected with a storage machine local in the data center?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2011 4:48 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 1691
Location: Montreal, QC
You don't need a private network server, since it'd going to have to go public to get to Linode's network inside the DC anyhow.

SoftLayer's CloudLayer storage pricing is cheaper than what you're proposing, they'll sell you storage in the DC as low as $0.15 per gigabyte. Here's the equivalent pay-as-you-go and built-in-bandwidth packages for 100GB of storage:

Storage: 100GB
Base price: $19/mth
Inbound: Unlimited
Outbound: 1GB included, $0.10/GB extra

Storage: 100GB
Base price: $38/mth
Inbound: Unlimited
Outbound: 500GB included, $0.10/GB extra

I don't think you can use it for POSIX-style filesystems, though. Their StorageLayer (which is the back-end for CloudLayer) service definitely can be, though, and you can access that through a SoftLayer VPS. The cheapest such one is $79/mth, and SAN storage is $0.10 per gig...

What would be interesting would be if you could talk SoftLayer into letting your linode talk right to the SAN...


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2011 7:51 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 12:57 am
Posts: 273
Guspaz wrote:
You don't need a private network server, since it'd going to have to go public to get to Linode's network inside the DC anyhow.


I guess I didn't understand what 'private network server' meant then, I assumed that it meant that you don't get a public IP, and thus get no public bandwidth allotment, but that your server has an IP that is routable within the data center and thus its services can be used by other systems that you rent within the data center; and then I further assumed that Linodes would have such access, being in the same data center. But I guess this is wrong?

Guspaz wrote:
SoftLayer's CloudLayer storage pricing is cheaper than what you're proposing, they'll sell you storage in the DC as low as $0.15 per gigabyte. Here's the equivalent pay-as-you-go and built-in-bandwidth packages for 100GB of storage:

Storage: 100GB
Base price: $19/mth
Inbound: Unlimited
Outbound: 1GB included, $0.10/GB extra

Storage: 100GB
Base price: $38/mth
Inbound: Unlimited
Outbound: 500GB included, $0.10/GB extra

I don't think you can use it for POSIX-style filesystems, though. Their StorageLayer (which is the back-end for CloudLayer) service definitely can be, though, and you can access that through a SoftLayer VPS. The cheapest such one is $79/mth, and SAN storage is $0.10 per gig...

What would be interesting would be if you could talk SoftLayer into letting your linode talk right to the SAN...


So what I'm thinking of is a networked storage device to be treated either as a networked filesystem or as a network block device by Linodes. The above configurations you mentioned don't do that, although maybe the direct-to-SAN option would, but SoftLayer doesn't sell that as far as I can tell.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2011 11:09 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 1:55 pm
Posts: 1739
Location: Rochester, New York
bji wrote:
I guess I didn't understand what 'private network server' meant then, I assumed that it meant that you don't get a public IP, and thus get no public bandwidth allotment, but that your server has an IP that is routable within the data center and thus its services can be used by other systems that you rent within the data center; and then I further assumed that Linodes would have such access, being in the same data center. But I guess this is wrong?


Everything outside of Linode's network is the outside world, as far as the network is concerned -- they don't have access to any other back-end networks that might exist elsewhere in the building.

_________________
Code:
/* TODO: need to add signature to posts */


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 18, 2011 10:34 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 1691
Location: Montreal, QC
bji wrote:
So what I'm thinking of is a networked storage device to be treated either as a networked filesystem or as a network block device by Linodes. The above configurations you mentioned don't do that, although maybe the direct-to-SAN option would, but SoftLayer doesn't sell that as far as I can tell.


Once you buy a $79 CloudLayer VPS, you can add as much SAN storage as you want, and then the CloudLayer VPS could be your access point that all your Linodes connect to. How you share it from the CloudLayer box would be up to you. You could treat it as a networked filesystem (SMB, NFS), or as a block device (iSCSI). Although if you were to use iSCSI, it'd actually be two layers of iSCSI (or rather, two distinct iSCSI hops with the CloudLayer box in the middle).

Alternatively, it's possible that you could just route between SoftLayer's SAN and your linode using a CloudLayer VPS to bounce the traffic. That's not necessarily conducive to selling it as a service, since you could probably only do that to one Linode, but even at 50GB it'd be cheaper than Linode extra storage ($2/GB).

The downside to all this is you're going to be double-billed for bandwidth, both on Linode and SoftLayer's side.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
RSS

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group