Linode Forum
Linode Community Forums
 FAQFAQ    SearchSearch    MembersMembers      Register Register 
 LoginLogin [ Anonymous ] 
Post new topic  Reply to topic
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 2:51 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 4:09 pm
Posts: 594
NeonNero wrote:
what used to be a Linode 512 (the smallest service plan) was previously a Linode 360, and a few years before that, it was called "Linode 64".


I still remember the Linode 1, those were horrible - you had to edit the hard drive data by hand using little tiny magnets.

James


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 3:37 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 1:55 pm
Posts: 1739
Location: Rochester, New York
zunzun wrote:
I still remember the Linode 1, those were horrible - you had to edit the hard drive data by hand using little tiny magnets.


Indeed... it was long enough ago that the battle cry was for "More Core!", even using the old-style spelling of "moar". Those were the old days.

_________________
Code:
/* TODO: need to add signature to posts */


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 4:48 pm 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 11:51 pm
Posts: 2
I was going to say the only thing I currently want is IPv6 in Atlanta, but looks like it's on the way (at least if the "Internal Testing" on the IPv6 status page tells me anything).


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 12:25 am 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 4:01 pm
Posts: 569
Website: http://www.mattnordhoff.com/
Jeremy-J wrote:
3) I like to use the linode dns as my slave server. For slaves, allow us to view the records linode dns currently holds for such domain. Would help me ensure I have it setup right.

For what it's worth, if you enable zone transfers in the DNS manager, you can always do a 'dig @nsX.linode.com. jeremyj.com. axfr" to see that data. (Of course, so can anyone else!)

_________________
Matt Nordhoff (aka Peng on IRC)


Top
   
 Post subject: clone linode via API
PostPosted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 6:26 am 
Offline
Senior Newbie

Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 2:46 pm
Posts: 5
Just one thing I want to see improved.


1. Augment API to enable linodes to be cloned.

viewtopic.php?t=4920&highlight=api+create

I want to have a single tested image that I can use as a basis for nightly backups to be restored to.

Thus each night the standby linode would be cloned from a standardised base install, and the backups restored to that.

I don't want to re-install the entire thing (as versions in repos might change, it will be slower, etc.) I know that I can 'pin' versions in repos, but there is far more to my configurations than just the setup of a repo. Short of reproducing various repos for myself, and packaging up lots of other software into RPMs for those repos (to ensure availability), it would be far less work for me to simply be able to clone linodes and apply the data changes from the backup.

And as there were several people asking for this a couple of years back, I don't feel my request is too obscure :)


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 9:36 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 9:13 am
Posts: 1
Website: http://www.shados.net
WLM: chaosshados@30gigs.com
AOL: Nazfellun
Location: Melbourne, Australia
hoopycat wrote:
(I'll be back on as soon as I'm caught up with coursework ha ha hahaha why am I in the forums oh god I'm going to fail)


I know exactly how you feel >.>.

hoopycat wrote:
So, something in the middle. Perhaps NFS to a massive NAS, or something involving GlusterFS, or both. Or maybe the rsync.net (Not Affiliated With rsync Industries) model would work.

It would necessarily be slower than local storage, but that's OK, just as long as it's cheaper and won't impact core service reliability.

Anonymous HTTP access (e.g. S3-style static hosting, perhaps integrated with NodeBalancer?) would still be nice, for those folks still using Apache+mod_php, but... eh, screw 'em.


1. That ^, more or less. Cheaper, necessarily slower add-on storage option(s).

2. More/better short-term billing options. There's a handful of things I'd like to be able to test out on Linodes of varying sizes for a day or two at a time, but it's kind of a pain in the ass to do so at the moment.

3. A datacentre in Australia, or at least somewhere in SEA. In all honesty, dealing with the 200ms-ish latency with US servers isn't that bad for the most part, but it does ruin some otherwise cool ideas.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 10:35 am 
Offline
Junior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 10:23 am
Posts: 24
Website: http://zhaoke.com
WLM: Ask Me!
Location: Islab.org
just hope linode will have datacenter in Asia, like as singapore or hongkong.

_________________
http://zhaoke.com


Top
   
 Post subject: continental dc's
PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 6:09 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 5:56 am
Posts: 1
I've had clients refuse cloud based applications because there are possibilities of connection failures and prefer local servers. From what I can remember a few years ago a line in the Mediterranean was severed due to an underwater earthquake and there were outages all over Africa, Balkans and the Middle East.

Considering the submarine cables and their rate of failure (which is not low) DCs should be set up at least on every continent. (Asia, Africa, South America, Australia, etc..) I would accept a slightly higher fee for these (remote?) DCs.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 1:38 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:25 pm
Posts: 118
Website: http://www.alohatone.com
Location: Hawaii
Alohatone wrote:
1) Datacenter in Hawaii
- i know i know, but I'd like to have a cloud here, even if it was small.
- i'd fund the rack... we can get 1Gig IP here, but why? start with 100MB. I'll even fund the IP.
- Wavecom (telco here put up a cloud in Kona, HI and Honolulu, HI) - http://wavecomsolutions.com/waveflex/

2) Management of multiple linode
- ability to compress / expand display group of linodes
- cumulative graph of all node traffic
- support ticket node selection alphabetical (not by order purchased)

3) IPs move between data centers
- we understand the bgp issues
- without NAT
- Linode would have to have a private network on the backend

We love the linode "system" - even if the management interface never changes, that's ok with us. I understand its not worth having the ability to move IPs between data centers (while possible, not worth it)....

I really only have 1 request.

Move to a California InterNap Datacenter and get out of HE.net.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 2:12 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 1691
Location: Montreal, QC
Alohatone wrote:
We love the linode "system" - even if the management interface never changes, that's ok with us.

Never changes? It was completely replaced less than a year ago.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:44 pm
Posts: 1
These Fremont downtimes are making my clients extremely angry at me. They are my only complaint and they are enough to make me second guess linode and make me look at other options again.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:47 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:25 pm
Posts: 118
Website: http://www.alohatone.com
Location: Hawaii
rtconner wrote:
These Fremont downtimes are making my clients extremely angry at me. They are my only complaint and they are enough to make me second guess linode and make me look at other options again.


2nd that.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:58 pm 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:57 pm
Posts: 3
Alohatone wrote:
rtconner wrote:
They are my only complaint and they are enough to make me second guess linode and make me look at other options again.


2nd that.


Yep. I know a hand full of people doing exactly that at this moment. Incredibly disappointing.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 4:04 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2011 8:24 am
Posts: 412
Location: Cyberspace
Using only one datacenter is like putting all your eggs in one basket. Best to have a server in at least two or three different physical locations for your important stuff. I doubt Google would have lasted this long with only one datacenter, they'd be lagging to a standstill if they tried that, not to mention all the hackers, and the high possibility of losing service altogether :)

_________________
Kris the Piki Geeker


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 9:25 pm 
Offline
Junior Member

Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 8:28 pm
Posts: 28
1) Ditch centos and include scientific linux. SL has been way better with keeping things up to date, actually has a security team dedicated to testing upstream packages. If it's good enough for the LHC it's good enough for me.

2) Manage multiple linode accounts with one login. I'd like the billing for my private VPS separate from any I manage for someone else. I know, the answer to this before was "you can use the api to manage multiple accts", but this is my wishlist, and I'll put what I want on it.

3) domain registration. yeah, this has been asked for before too.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: mattltm and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
RSS

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group