Linode Forum
Linode Community Forums
 FAQFAQ    SearchSearch    MembersMembers      Register Register 
 LoginLogin [ Anonymous ] 
Post new topic  Reply to topic
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 1:42 pm 
Offline
Junior Member

Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 7:58 pm
Posts: 25
Here we go again ...


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 1:52 pm 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 7:27 pm
Posts: 3
Confirmed, major issues with my Fremont instance.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 3:12 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:25 pm
Posts: 118
Website: http://www.alohatone.com
Location: Hawaii
We've gotta leave Fremont, too bad linode doesn't have another west coast data center.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 5:30 pm 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:57 pm
Posts: 3
Again, really? Freemont is a joke at this point.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 5:30 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 1691
Location: Montreal, QC
Alohatone wrote:
We've gotta leave Fremont, too bad linode doesn't have another west coast data center.


How is the latency from Hawaii to Tokyo?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 5:33 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:25 pm
Posts: 118
Website: http://www.alohatone.com
Location: Hawaii
Fremont ddos is back.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 5:34 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:25 pm
Posts: 118
Website: http://www.alohatone.com
Location: Hawaii
Guspaz wrote:
Alohatone wrote:
We've gotta leave Fremont, too bad linode doesn't have another west coast data center.


How is the latency from Hawaii to Tokyo?


PING tokyo1.linode.com (106.187.33.12): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 106.187.33.12: icmp_seq=0 ttl=54 time=177.671 ms
64 bytes from 106.187.33.12: icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=175.401 ms
64 bytes from 106.187.33.12: icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=175.462 ms
64 bytes from 106.187.33.12: icmp_seq=3 ttl=54 time=176.791 ms
64 bytes from 106.187.33.12: icmp_seq=4 ttl=54 time=175.857 ms
64 bytes from 106.187.33.12: icmp_seq=5 ttl=54 time=174.630 ms
64 bytes from 106.187.33.12: icmp_seq=6 ttl=54 time=174.882 ms


PING fremont1.linode.com (64.71.152.17): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 64.71.152.17: icmp_seq=0 ttl=56 time=67.692 ms
64 bytes from 64.71.152.17: icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=67.367 ms
64 bytes from 64.71.152.17: icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=66.088 ms
64 bytes from 64.71.152.17: icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=66.321 ms
64 bytes from 64.71.152.17: icmp_seq=4 ttl=56 time=77.084 ms


PING dallas1.linode.com (69.164.200.100): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 69.164.200.100: icmp_seq=0 ttl=52 time=92.661 ms
64 bytes from 69.164.200.100: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=90.804 ms
64 bytes from 69.164.200.100: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=88.173 ms
64 bytes from 69.164.200.100: icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=86.775 ms
64 bytes from 69.164.200.100: icmp_seq=4 ttl=52 time=91.599 ms


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 5:38 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 1691
Location: Montreal, QC
I did a search through status.linode.com and compiled the list of outages (power or network) over the past year, roughly... Fremont has at least twice as many outages as any other datacenter...

SoftLayer has a DC in Fremont (well, San Jose), but it seems like Linode picks a different company for each DC to have better isolation. Surely there is some DC in Fremont that isn't as problematic as HE?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 5:46 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:25 pm
Posts: 118
Website: http://www.alohatone.com
Location: Hawaii
Really linode should move to someone like InterNap... I know its more, but fremont has cause us to move.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 5:59 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:25 pm
Posts: 118
Website: http://www.alohatone.com
Location: Hawaii
as of 11:59am HST - fremont is back down.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 6:08 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 8:23 pm
Posts: 60
very frustrating.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 6:09 pm 
Offline
Junior Member

Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 7:58 pm
Posts: 25
Crap. I should have started the migration earlier ... like yesterday ...


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 6:09 pm 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 7:27 pm
Posts: 3
Yup, down again. God dammit.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 6:13 pm 
Offline
Senior Newbie

Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 11:26 pm
Posts: 15
Aside from Fremont, what would you guys suggest to be the next best datacentre for the West Coast?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 6:16 pm 
Offline
Junior Member

Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 7:58 pm
Posts: 25
http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthrea ... ic+fremont

Date on that post is 6/21. Seems pretty clear HE hasn't figured out how to deal with this ...


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
RSS

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group