Linode Forum
Linode Community Forums
 FAQFAQ    SearchSearch    MembersMembers      Register Register 
 LoginLogin [ Anonymous ] 
Post new topic  Reply to topic
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 3:23 am 
Offline
Senior Newbie
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 7:17 am
Posts: 19
ICQ: 153424241
Website: http://www.3ware.it
WLM: pxtmc@hotmail.com
Yahoo Messenger: pxtmc@yahoo.it
AOL: pxtmc
Location: Prato, Italy
After the last reboot on past sunday, I noticed the kernel of my VPS has been "promoted" from the version 3.0.4 to the 3.2.1. My VPS is configured to use the "Latest 3.0 kernel".
This morning the control panel propose the version 3.0.18 instead of the 3.2.1 as the "latest 3.0 kernel".

Which kernel version is safe to use? Which is the reason for these jumps in the kernel assignment as "latest 3.0" version?

Thank you


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:26 pm 
Offline
Junior Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2011 8:54 am
Posts: 44
When youre linode is configured for "latest 3.0 kernel", it will automatically use the kernel marked at "latest" by Linode, after much testing, but it only takes effect on reboots. The version it shows as "latest" should be the tested and stable version.

If your reboot ended up with a newer kernel, and you are sure you didn't change it by mistake, the likeliest story is they pushed out a kernel update, then rolled it back when some unforseen problem arose. It happens sometimes. You may not have rebooted after previous updates (one of my 'nodes is still on a 2.6 kernel).

You can always change it and reboot, should be no problem if you are running now. If you're not sure, you can always open a support ticket, which they answer within minutes!


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:30 pm 
Offline
Junior Member

Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2010 7:41 pm
Posts: 27
There were some issues with 3.2.1 causing system instability so 3.0.18 was set to the 'Latest' stable kernel.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:41 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 8:44 pm
Posts: 1121
Shouldn't 3.2.1 be labeled "latest 3.2 kernel"? Or maybe just "latest stable kernel", since the version number goes up so quickly these days.

(On a not-so-related note, Firefox just told me it's ready to upgrade to version 10. Wow, already? Zimbabwe should be jealous of our hyper-inflation rate.)


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 4:53 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 1:55 pm
Posts: 1739
Location: Rochester, New York
A more accurate description would be "Latest 3.x"; the 2.6.39 -> 3.0 roll dropped a digit from the version. So, in effect, instead of 2.6.40, 2.6.41, 2.6.42, ..., we get 3.0, 3.1, 3.2, ....

The 3.0.x kernels are security/bug fixes atop the existing 3.0 kernel, so 3.0.8 would be 2.6.40.8 under the old numbering system. -rt


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 4:20 am 
Offline
Senior Newbie
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 7:17 am
Posts: 19
ICQ: 153424241
Website: http://www.3ware.it
WLM: pxtmc@hotmail.com
Yahoo Messenger: pxtmc@yahoo.it
AOL: pxtmc
Location: Prato, Italy
Thank you all. Tonight I rebooted my node and now it's running with the 3.0.18 stable kernel version.

Probably I have been unlucky rebooting my node in the meantime, between the 3.2.1 "promotion" and its stability check...

Next time I'll check the kernel version before rebooting :D

Thanks


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
RSS

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group