Linode Forum
Linode Community Forums
 FAQFAQ    SearchSearch    MembersMembers      Register Register 
 LoginLogin [ Anonymous ] 
Post new topic  Reply to topic
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri May 06, 2005 7:09 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2003 8:29 am
Posts: 100
Website: http://www.ipo-australia.com
Location: Tropical Queensland, Australia
Yesterday my linode was not responding, and the control panel said if was switched off. I booted thru the control panel and all was well.

Now it happened again today 4 times. It ran for a few minutes before being powered off. I downgraded from the 2.6 to 2.4 kernel and its been working OK for 10 hours.

The linode was host2/Redhat large pofile/2.6 kernel. The log messaged showed nothing when it stopped. Setup had been changed in months.

I've seen this happen very occasionally in the past but 4 times in 2 hours is too much. Has anyone else experienced this?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 06, 2005 8:07 pm 
Offline
Linode Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 6:24 pm
Posts: 3090
Website: http://www.linode.com/
Location: Galloway, NJ
"logview" via Lish shows the following panic:

Code:
Kernel panic - not syncing: Kernel mode fault at addr 0x8, ip 0x400fa148
 
EIP: 0073:[<400fa148>] CPU: 0 Not tainted ESP: 007b:bffffd88 EFLAGS: 00000246
    Not tainted
EAX: 00000001 EBX: 00000000 ECX: bffffdab EDX: 00000001
ESI: 0804ad00 EDI: bffffdab EBP: bffffdb8 DS: 007b ES: 007b
Call Trace:
 [<80034549>] vprintk+0xe9/0x13c
 [<800421ee>] notifier_call_chain+0x1e/0x38
 [<80033a9e>] panic+0x56/0xbc
 [<8001d907>] segv+0x83/0x1c8
 [<8001d9d6>] segv+0x152/0x1c8
 [<8030f1d7>] sigemptyset+0x17/0x30
 [<8001bd91>] change_signals+0x41/0x6c
 [<8001dd3c>] segv_handler+0x160/0x208
 [<8001dcab>] segv_handler+0xcf/0x208
 [<80022d2c>] sig_handler_common_skas+0x7c/0x98
 [<80022d45>] sig_handler_common_skas+0x95/0x98
 [<8001de2a>] sig_handler+0x32/0x34
 [<8030edfd>] __libc_longjmp+0x3d/0x50
 [<8030eded>] __libc_longjmp+0x2d/0x50
 [<80022eda>] do_buffer_op+0x76/0x120
 [<8030eef8>] __restore+0x0/0x8
 [<80023963>] chan_window_size+0x7/0x44
 [<8001ebc2>] setjmp_wrapper+0x16/0x50
 [<8030f1d7>] sigemptyset+0x17/0x30
 [<8001bed4>] set_signals+0x6c/0x10c
 [<8030f1d7>] sigemptyset+0x17/0x30
 [<8001bd91>] change_signals+0x41/0x6c
 [<8030f1d7>] sigemptyset+0x17/0x30
 [<8030f1d7>] sigemptyset+0x17/0x30
 [<8001bed4>] set_signals+0x6c/0x10c
 [<801fee85>] tty_read+0xa5/0xf0
 [<802043fc>] write_chan+0x0/0x29c
 [<80065b5b>] vfs_read+0xc3/0xf4
 [<80065d97>] sys_read+0x3b/0x68
 [<800228a6>] execute_syscall_skas+0xaa/0xec
 [<80025149>] winch_interrupt+0x49/0xa8
 [<80017047>] handle_IRQ_event+0x27/0x6c
 [<800171e0>] do_IRQ+0x68/0xc4
 [<80022d84>] user_signal+0x3c/0x44
 [<80021efb>] userspace+0x18f/0x1e4
 [<8030eef8>] __restore+0x0/0x8
 [<8030f151>] kill+0x11/0x20

I'll report this to the uml-devel mailing list, however judging by the chan_window_size and winch_interrupt system calls, I believe this is the bug that Newsome has been hunting for months, and has been recently fixed in UML. I'll try to get a new 2.6-um kernel out in the next week or two.

-Chris


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
RSS

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group