Linode Forum
Linode Community Forums
 FAQFAQ    SearchSearch    MembersMembers      Register Register 
 LoginLogin [ Anonymous ] 
Post new topic  Reply to topic
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 12:06 pm 
Offline
Linode Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 6:24 pm
Posts: 3090
Website: http://www.linode.com/
Location: Galloway, NJ
I pushed out 3.0.0 kernels yesterday afternoon - it would be great if they could get some testing before pointing Latest to them!

Looks like kernel reserved memory is back down to saner levels for 64 bit (32 bit was corrected in 2.6.39.1).

Thanks!
-Chris


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 12:33 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 4:09 pm
Posts: 594
caker wrote:
Looks like kernel reserved memory is back down to saner levels for 64 bit


...and a great cheer rose up throughout the land!

James


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 1:20 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 2:25 am
Posts: 75
Website: http://www.ruchirablog.com
Location: Sri Lanka
caker wrote:

Looks like kernel reserved memory is back down to saner levels for 64 bit

Thanks!
-Chris


:twisted:


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 3:58 pm 
Offline
Senior Newbie
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 10:37 am
Posts: 18
Seems to be working fine thus far on my ubuntu 10.04 node & a debian 6 node as well though debian one isn't doing much of anything besides nginx currently


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 1:30 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:21 am
Posts: 144
It does appear to solve the reserved memory problem introduced in 2.6.39.

However, I did notice that the 3.0.0-x86_64-linode20 kernel appears to somehow break the console (Lish) on my Debian squeeze (6) machine:

The end of the output looks like this (no login prompt):
Code:
Loading kernel modules...done.                                                  
Activating lvm and md swap...done.                                             
Checking file systems...fsck from util-linux-ng 2.17.2                         
done.                                                                           
Mounting local filesystems...done.                                             
Activating swapfile swap...done.                                               
Cleaning up temporary files....                                                 
Configuring network interfaces...done.                                         
Cleaning up temporary files....                                                 
Setting kernel variables ...done.                                               
Skip starting firewall: ufw (not enabled)...done.                               
INIT: Entering runlevel: 2                                                     
Using makefile-style concurrent boot in runlevel 2.                             
Starting enhanced syslogd: rsyslogd.                                           
Starting domain name service...: bind9.                                         
Starting periodic command scheduler: cron.                                     
Starting dictionary server: dictd.                                             
Starting nginx: nginx.                                                         
Starting NTP server: ntpd.                                                     
Starting Postfix Mail Transport Agent: postfixsshd (1720): /proc/1720/oom_adj is deprecated, please use /proc/1720/oom_score_adj instead.                       
Starting OpenBSD Secure Shell server: sshd.                                     
.                                                                               



Reverting back to Latest paravirt (2.6.39.1-x86_64-linode19) fixes the console again.


I have not looked into this further, I suppose it's something in Debian that breaks with a 3.0 kernel...


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 9:37 pm 
Offline
Linode Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 6:24 pm
Posts: 3090
Website: http://www.linode.com/
Location: Galloway, NJ
A fix for this was deployed this afternoon. Give it another shot.

-Chris


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 7:16 am 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:21 am
Posts: 144
caker wrote:
A fix for this was deployed this afternoon. Give it another shot.

-Chris


Great, seems to work fine now!


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 8:34 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 1:32 pm
Posts: 737
Location: Italy
is there someone who booted this kernel on CentOS 6?
Is it ok?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 13, 2011 1:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 1:11 am
Posts: 1
I am giving this a go now.

On my Linode 768 it's showing 740mb of total ram - which means the kernel hogging has reduced (a good thing) - Everything seems to be working well.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:32 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 1:32 pm
Posts: 737
Location: Italy
thanks for the answer michael... are you using CentOS 6?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2011 10:17 am 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 4:09 pm
Posts: 594
It is working well for me.

James


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2011 10:19 am 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 1:32 pm
Posts: 737
Location: Italy
zunzun wrote:
It is working well for me.

James


Don't you think that an interesting feedback like this could be more interesting if you tell us also what distro are you running?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2011 3:36 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 4:09 pm
Posts: 594
sblantipodi wrote:
Don't you think that an interesting feedback like this could be more interesting if you tell us also what distro are you running?


No.

James


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 16, 2011 5:36 am 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 12:44 am
Posts: 92
Seems to run fine on my Ubuntu 11.04 64-bit.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 16, 2011 5:25 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 4:11 pm
Posts: 554
Website: http://www.unixtastic.com
Location: Europe
Working for me so far on Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit.

My total memory went down from:
MemTotal: 502008 kB
to
MemTotal: 500452 kB

It's not a significant difference anyway.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
RSS

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group